- Joined
- Nov 30, 2015
- Posts
- 311
better call geico....
Last edited:
Honestly I thought it would not be so close and I think IMBA did a pretty good job considering that they needed a controlled environment. But in reality we are not going to get 500 traditional MTB's through on a trail, then 500 e-MTB's, it is going to be a mix of hikers and in some areas horses so is there really going any difference to trail damage? There are cases where the e-MTB's did less damage to the trail than a regular MTB. I would be interested if we saw similar percentages from comparing a fully rigid bike to a full suspension or even tires, 26" vs. 27.5+ or 29?IMBA study on the effect on E-bikes on trails verses regular mountain bikes and motorcycles.
I think the main difference is with a motorcycle all you do is twist the throttle. An ebike won't do anything unless you're already pedalling (as I understand it). Much more bicycle than dirtbike imho. I do agree that the rules need to be clarified for eveyone's convenience, both riders and enforcement.Your message to work with each other is commendable, but I don't think your analogies are on point. No one is argueing whether mtb and emtb's should be racing with each other, its obvious they should not. The question is should emtb's be allowed on hiking trails (which mtb's are allowed on) or should they be regulated to "motorized" trails with the dirt bikes and ATV's. Its all about regulating use of "public access" land.
I assume you are talking about competitions or hunting, maybe I am wrong. I think of guns (which I don't like) but I wouldn't want to be in a match with a high powered rifle if I had a shot gun (unless the targe was 10 feet away). Ebikes are new, should they be regulated like motorcyles or bicylces, they are a combo of both, argueably.
IMBA study on the effect on E-bikes on trails verses regular mountain bikes and motorcycles.
Both these go into same reply, as it's similar thing... I don't think those extra 10kg on emtb makes difference when "destroying" trails. So based on this, I don't really believe emtb by itself would make more damage then proper mtb. But what it hard to take into account is people riding one or the other bike. I was cruising some more popular mtb destinations in Alps and Dolomites in last few weeks, and I was honestly surprised about amount of mopeds (yeah fuc** it... it's moped not bike and it doesn't really matter if you add gas by turning grip on handlebar or slowly spinning your feet) on mountains. Two years ago there was lot of it, but now it's more like 90:10 for e-mtb up on mountains (some 2500m high) and probably 1000:1 down in valleys (road bikes on the other hand are still pretty much all human powered). And here comes problem with damage and also answer to "can't we all just get along". No, we unfortunately can not. If e-mtb users would be people who were riding normal mtb's for years then sure, we could, except for few occasions when someone with moped tries to race with you (in real life or on Strava) . But, at least over here, majority, if not every single one, of e-mtb users are people for who cycling was just too hard thing, and they never knew how to behave on trails. And it's pretty obvious this nowadays. So for all what we have been fighting for, all that "getting along" with other users of trails, mainly mountaineers over here, is going to be destroyed real fast with attitude most of these guys have.Can't we all just get along?