OTOH, electric motors are 100% efficient and gas less than 50%.Yeah, batteries are horrid at storing energy compared to gas. Especially when there is free oxygen available.
OTOH, electric motors are 100% efficient and gas less than 50%.Yeah, batteries are horrid at storing energy compared to gas. Especially when there is free oxygen available.
Yes, but the loss via transmission of power by an electric motor directly coupled to the wheel(s) or axle is substantially less than through a gearbox (transmission). Of course, an electric motor also weighs dramatically less than an internal combustion motor too (also has a much longer service life).@skibob Not quite true. Electric motors do have losses - probably at least 10% to the wheels. Generating that power is quite inefficient (solar panels have to run for several years to equal the energy to build them and they are 20% efficient). Battery charging and life incur losses. No magic just because it's electric.
The magic comes from how a small electric motor can subtly improve the feel of a bicycle while keeping a bicycling experience.
@Philpug has an analytical approach to evaluations. His take on performance and feel is worth considering. I'd be interested in having Phil strap on a heart monitor and compare the net workout data between an ebike and a regular mountain bike...
Eric
@skibobHopefully I'm not boosting the whole time and can score some recharge on the downhill.
I know I am out of shape, but I don't think that I am that out of shape that I could not ride to the trail head and be this winded. I was more winded/worked in that short ride than I was in my whole e-bike ride that I actually had fun on. I don't feel that the Moterra did that much work of the ride that I was on... My next bike will be an e-bike.
(I did want to post a photo from Jerry of the Day of a Miata with a jetski in the passenger seat which I would title "Phil is training for a triathlon?")
As I get older and they can manage to maybe get the weight down a bit I can see myself getting on one of these. For now Im all about pedaling 100 percent. Some of these climbs around here get a bit ridiculous!
Of course it does, but it changes the pedaling motion in the process. This is why racers train behind a motorpace bike, they need the faster spin of a racer, not the plod of a touring rider. The motor gives a similar feel.Drag reduction argument for a drafting cyclist is interesting. Academics think that drafting assistance can reduce effort of trailing cyclist by 25-50%.
I came across this funny and informative reference to the health benefits of e-bikes, with an (Edit: satirical) spin from a cyclist's perspective:I know I am out of shape, but I don't think that I am that out of shape that I could not ride to the trail head and be this winded. I was more winded/worked in that short ride than I was in my whole e-bike ride that I actually had fun on. I don't feel that the Moterra did that much work of the ride that I was on but I was ginning ear to ear. If this isn't mountain biking by some standards, sorry, this is getting me out riding, I am getting dirty and sweaty and giggling. My next bike will be an e-bike.
Wow, he is an angry person, isn't he.I came across this funny and informative reference to the health benefits of e-bikes, with a spin from a cyclist's perspective:
“Do all those idiots who look like idiots riding those idiot bikes actually get any health benefit from it?”That whole post is a great read.
And the heretical answer is yes, they do. People for Bikes links to a study on its web site that examines this question, albeit in slightly more academic terms than mine. It notes that the most recent study of this question looked at cycling and e-bike riding in Norway and found that e-bike riders, while spending less time and effort than on dino bikes, still get moderate physical activity from it. The researchers define and quantify the phrase “moderate physical activity,” if you’re into such things as facts (I’m not); this phrase is kind of a holy grail in the world of public health because people who get sufficient moderate physical activity 150 minutes a week obtain significant, life-altering health benefits.
The study also notes that many researchers have explored and concluded that “the impacts of active transportation modes,” i.e. getting off your fat ass, have a big effect on physical health. Active transportation modes such as walking, cycling, and, gulp, e-biking, are associated with reduced obesity, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes. Using active transportation modes for even part of a commute is associated with engaging in other physical activities for exercise and recreation (shocking).
Furthermore, the study notes that involvement in active commuting reduces the risk of all-cause mortality and increases the number of years lived without cardiovascular disease. Even smokers benefit, as higher levels of activity result in more years of life expectancy as well as more years of life without disability. The study reports that among a prospective cohort study of adults in living near Copenhagen, active transportation to work via cycling was associated with a 40% decreased risk of mortality, even after controlling for other sources of aerobic physical activity.
To all of this I would say, and I think you would agree, that death, disease, and crippling disability are a small price to pay for not having to ride a heavy motorized bike, happily, helmetless, in flip-flops, with a pair of equally floppy and comfortable dickhider cotton shorts.
Source: I hate your e-bike
Before anyone gets all overly sensitive, the post is very much pro-e-bike, and I agree with it. I still don't think they belong on mountain bike trails where motorized vehicles are prohibited.
@Philpug, if it get's you out riding more, potentially living longer and healthier, and continuing to ski at a high level into your later years, get the e-bike!
Well, it's satire and just as satirical about cyclists as e-bikes.Wow, he is an angry person, isn't he.
No one 'accomidated' (sic) mountain bikers. We forced out way to the table and worked for decades to get access. 'The Person' in your hypothetical needs to put his or her big boy/girl pants on and build some trail for themselves and their friends... which will need to be 'multi use' and open to hikers, joggers and non-motorized bikes. These trails will, of course, by under constant threat of closure to ebikes due to user conflict with other users (who will refuse to help with funding or maintenance). .
Can you post a link to it?Our local paper just ran an editorial "open the trails to electric assist bikes". I have to agree with them, those trails are on public land, and restrictions need to be based on practical matters, not personal feelings. The class 1 pedal assist ebikes mix very well with the other bikes, and ought to have access.