@Muleski do you think things have improved since Marolt left?
I do in some respects. My interest and focus is on alpine racing, and I'm not on top of the specifics of the other disciplines.
I'm frustrated with the continued "funding gap", and the demands we placed on athletes there. I'm frustrated by the annual anxiety over making criteria and being named to the team. At times I think the criteria is too objective and the athletes are always on edge about world rankings. We seem to expect a lot and wash many out early. Particularly when I track the careers of many European skiers.
I think that progress has been made in what was a deplorable development program under Marolt. I was glad to see the US Team academy cease and less emphasis on the NGT, and USST D team. I think we need a D team type group for speed skiers good enough to be on the Europa Cup, and I don't know that it needs to be a named group/team. I feel that what Chip Knight is doing makes sense. Get strong people to coordinate efforts in each region, develop projects, and work collaboratively. The small clubs will scream to some degree but the skiers are coming from larger well resourced clubs and academies. We seem to have an awful lot of talented kids, and now we are exposing them to a lot of racing in Europe, where they do well. They younger pipeline, say ages 22 and younger seems better.
Now do USST personnel have much to do with that? Very few. No coaches.
On the con side, We seem to have fallen into the old ways of letting athletes hang on as long as they want. Something seems wrong about that, in terms of how you allocate resources. We have a huge gap with birth years with no athletes. That is a hangover from the Marolt years. I think all you can do is build from the young up. It takes years. And I can get impatient..
I feel that Tiger Shaw gives it his all, is a great guy, and does his absolute best. Is he the right guy, and a turnaround guy? Has enough happened, fast enough? Has he grown the headcount and overhead too much with non essential jobs? They keep raising more money and increasing budget. The funding gap remains and our coaches are not well paid. A move to the USST normally involves a pay decrease.
The coaching staff works hard, real hard. Good people. But in any organization sometimes you get stale and new need new blood. From Alpine Program directors on down. Over the years we've flipped back and forth between hiring the best in the world and hiring a huge number of USST alums. It seems like it needs change. New approaches. Mikaela is on her own program, LV is as well along with Ligety. How do we handle that?
Nobody would suggest that the mother of our top athlete would ever tell Marolt what to do. She is half jokingly called the most powerful person in US skiing. I don't like it. I hope it goes away.
So, is it better post Bill Marolt? Hard to say. We still have the focus on big guns. "Best in the World", as measured by Olympic Medals. I HATE IT. It is not how the rest of the alpine works measures success.
On top of that, even using that measure, we have fallen. We are not as strong, even at the top as we have been. It's MS, and fingers crossed, LV. Hopefully one more LV year.
I think we got a bit carried away with MS. As tremendous as she is, it's easy to make a case for the "mikaela phenomenon" having had a steep price and trade-off for all of the success.
So....I think this needs a lot of work. A lot of strategic work. And new eyes, new perspective and new energy. Which takes time.
I think we were in the tank in a deep slide at the end of the Marolt era. My sense is that Tiger stopped that. Righted the ship to a large degree. But is it turned around and headed in the right direction as best it can? I don't think so.
I hear a ton of what sound like justifications and excuses. We don't understand "how complex this is." Or how "challenging raising the money is..."
It may not be easy. It is doable. I think it's time for more change. And I suspect that it means turning over a lot of people.
Just my $.02.......