Is this still about protecting one’s perception of exclusivity? It’s my world-class skiing, don’t mess it up for me.
The thing is, since we’re talking about Utah and Jackson, those are places highly dependent on tourism, and ski $$$ are a big chunk of their economies. They must have calculated that local skiers/boarders would not sustain the business, without the influx of Ikon and Epic pass holders.
And yet, the frenzy of the powder days is probably more due to locals rather than powder-chasing tourists.
So, without the tourists (whose numbers may have indeed increased due to Ikon and Epic), the traffic would still be crappy and the powder all tracked out within an hour, but without the additional revenue from tourists buying food, beverages, accommodations, lessons and the occasional pair of goggles, gloves as well as equipment rentals.
I think the net effect of Ikon and Epic is they bring consistency to skier visits. People buy these multi-resort passes, whether they have a local resort or not, they plan their travel ahead of time, they show up and spend money, even if the conditions aren’t epic enough to bring out locals.
If Alterra can improve the quality of their product experience, for locals as well as tourists, all these power to them. Hopefully any positive effects will make Vail Resorts takes notice and emulate.