My last Denver rental was a RWD 4Runner, with an open differential. I've never even seen one of those before. It's not that uncommon to get 2WD SUVs anymore....I will most likely get an SUV with 4WD at these skiing locations even if they won’t give me a 100% promise in writing? (Unless I get unlucky and I get the car being returned by the one person from FL...)
Cool! Now I can stop stressing about this and go back to drooling over the Jackson Hole Trail map : )Correct
Looking up prices for new AWD Chevy Traverse, it's not cheaper in Florida. The problem is, the only AWD are the most decked out vehicles and they only have a couple of them.
I did a price compare in Fort Collins and they sell for the same. I'd have to order one here in Florida. In Fort Collins, they'd have one on the lot.
Is there an extra fee to bring a new vehicle in Colorado? Like if I bought a new AWD in Florida, and moved it in, would I pay more for the first registration?
My own thoughts on chains are this: If the car is still moving forward, without slipping sideways, you don't need the chains. If you stop to put the chains on because you're concerned about getting stuck, your car becomes a beached whale; it ain't goin' anywhere until the chains are in place.Good idea. I'll call Colorado DMV.
What about using cables or chains as needed on the front of my FWD in addition to winter tires? Is that not something people do in Colorado? I've never seen them being used there.
So cables or chains would be suitable in addition to winter tires if I chose to keep my FWD?
I'm just trying to weigh all my options here.
Frankly, I would not drive I-70 from the Front Range with chains/cables on a passenger car. Generally, if it gets bad enough to need them on a vehicle with good tires they will close the road. There are chain up stations but they are intended for semi-trucks. There is a device called the Auto Sock that I've thought about buying just in case I got stuck in a bad situation but I haven't needed it yet.
Cables or chains have very little value for a front range skier. The speeds on the roads are too high. It's too dangerous to put them on, and the conditions change so often you'd likely have to mount and dismount them several times.
You'll do great with 2WD and *good* snow tires, studded or not. You'll be better off with *good* snow tires than the majority of vehicles, ie everyone with AWD and all-season tires.
It would be nice to trade out for an AWD vehicle, but totally unnecessary.
Yes, some Breck neighborhood streets are steep and often not sanded and plowed as well as it seems they should be.Don't know how many times I've seen FWD cars with snows unable to negotiate the uphill streets of Breckenridge. Going uphill, the weight of the vehicle shifts to the rear.
...
Likewise, skiing any Colorado ski area from the front range doesn't require the traction mountain residents need to climb their neighborhood streets and driveways. Even then, plenty of locals don't have AWD/4WD.
OK, some locals?Define 'plenty'.
Not being able to plow through 18" of snow with your FWD Mazda 3 is much more an issue of clearance than traction. You can only push so much snow with any given amount of traction.I have a Mazda 3 Sport (6 inches of ground clearance) with non-studded Hakkapeliitta R2. I got them when I was not sure where my next job would be. Studded tires are legal in Northern Ontario (Canada), but not in Southern Ontario. They will plow through a foot of snow, but not 18".
2) a front range skier doesn't need to drive on those neighborhood streets to ski Breck.
If we don't own a Subaru then we own a Tacoma. It's just that simple around here. We wave at everyone because we can't tell who are our neighbors and who aren't.