Well you ladies have said pretty much all my thoughts, well said.
I've mostly skied men's or unisex skis my whole life. I was excited when 'women's skis started. My first were "Peaks" Rossi's designed by Picabo Street. I loved those skis they ripped. They had pretty cool graphics too. I like skis for "how they ski". I really don't care about the top sheets. Sure there's some beauties which I'd love to look down at on the lift, but I'm not buying for looks or to match my coat. I buy for purpose. I have had some that were way too frilly (atomic heaven's gates went all pink flowers on me YUK). I do not want the naked ladies and yes some are just so boring. Pink annoys me I like bright colored skis "Just in case one comes off" will be easier to find in the white snow! I Was thinking that skiing my white renouns out west after 70 inches at Mammoth! (don't fall, don't loose a ski, why didn't I put powder cords on?) In the ski photos, I do like the Purple skis.. I totally agree with @Analisa on all points. I don't need a cute name. Some names are very bad as mentioned. I don't care if they are called Ranger.
I agree if the ski is built differently (different flex, rocker, dimensions) having it's own name makes sense.
I'm ok if it's the same ski in all ways but without metal I like the idea of "L" for light version vs W or F,
I like how technologically advanced skis have become, the more people ski companies can market too the better so by not having them W
but instead L, lighter men would purchase too? I'm all for uni-sex skis, in the olden days they were...
I also agree it's hard to get consistent data on skis, if we can't demo the ski we need to rely on reviews.
because of all the names, initials, same ski just shrink-ed and pinked it does make it difficult to sort thru.
I'd like an easier way to know the men's and women's ski is the same ski just different top sheet (because I'll take the one on sale LOL)
or if it is 'Light" no metal.or is the flex different and the dimensions or rocker.
I do like video reviews to see how the reviewer skis the ski. I like knowing who the review is and are their stats close to mine along with how the reviewer skis.
This site is great for sorting skis and does good comparisons, your reviews are very helpful to me.
@Tricia I'm curious- do ski designers who make 'women's skis" look at how women are physically different than men and try to make a better ski 'just for women' or is it shrink and pink..Since women come in all sizes, many women will always be in a man's ski.
Seems to me Marketing as Uni-sex would sell more skis. I wonder if newer lady skiers are intimidated by the 'manly skis' when in fact one of them might be the best ski for them but the ski shop sees 'female' and steers to a ski that is not suitable?
,
I've mostly skied men's or unisex skis my whole life. I was excited when 'women's skis started. My first were "Peaks" Rossi's designed by Picabo Street. I loved those skis they ripped. They had pretty cool graphics too. I like skis for "how they ski". I really don't care about the top sheets. Sure there's some beauties which I'd love to look down at on the lift, but I'm not buying for looks or to match my coat. I buy for purpose. I have had some that were way too frilly (atomic heaven's gates went all pink flowers on me YUK). I do not want the naked ladies and yes some are just so boring. Pink annoys me I like bright colored skis "Just in case one comes off" will be easier to find in the white snow! I Was thinking that skiing my white renouns out west after 70 inches at Mammoth! (don't fall, don't loose a ski, why didn't I put powder cords on?) In the ski photos, I do like the Purple skis.. I totally agree with @Analisa on all points. I don't need a cute name. Some names are very bad as mentioned. I don't care if they are called Ranger.
I agree if the ski is built differently (different flex, rocker, dimensions) having it's own name makes sense.
I'm ok if it's the same ski in all ways but without metal I like the idea of "L" for light version vs W or F,
I like how technologically advanced skis have become, the more people ski companies can market too the better so by not having them W
but instead L, lighter men would purchase too? I'm all for uni-sex skis, in the olden days they were...
I also agree it's hard to get consistent data on skis, if we can't demo the ski we need to rely on reviews.
because of all the names, initials, same ski just shrink-ed and pinked it does make it difficult to sort thru.
I'd like an easier way to know the men's and women's ski is the same ski just different top sheet (because I'll take the one on sale LOL)
or if it is 'Light" no metal.or is the flex different and the dimensions or rocker.
I do like video reviews to see how the reviewer skis the ski. I like knowing who the review is and are their stats close to mine along with how the reviewer skis.
This site is great for sorting skis and does good comparisons, your reviews are very helpful to me.
@Tricia I'm curious- do ski designers who make 'women's skis" look at how women are physically different than men and try to make a better ski 'just for women' or is it shrink and pink..Since women come in all sizes, many women will always be in a man's ski.
Seems to me Marketing as Uni-sex would sell more skis. I wonder if newer lady skiers are intimidated by the 'manly skis' when in fact one of them might be the best ski for them but the ski shop sees 'female' and steers to a ski that is not suitable?
,