Worse. Mine is perforated, just to make sure I will screw up even if I get lucky.
Dude, I am really sorry.
Worse. Mine is perforated, just to make sure I will screw up even if I get lucky.
@anders_nor's post about having skis in the car to match the conditions reminds me of this gem. If you can match have your skis handy, why not? I'd love to ski an hour on my SLs, then hop on my 98s and when they drop the rope get out my 120s. Power to you anders! I'll bet your friends' eyes just get wider and wider as you get them on the next condition-appropriate ski!
View attachment 127421
I live in a ski town, but take the bus. So for me it is a non-starter. When I begin to travel for skiing, I'll have the whole kit and caboodle with me and I'll be styling. I did do the ski swap thing at the Basin, but alas, I don't have a pass with the Basin anymore.It is not as complicated as it may seem. If you ski same mountain and your car is 20m from the bottom lift station and you carry 3 pairs of ski anyway, not a problem.
My wife is digging the Blossom N°1 Lady. She skied it well in what I would consider challenging conditions at Mt. Bachelor without a problem. It's probably not the best for off-piste but it worked for her at 67 underfoot.Maybe if manufacturers made more "all-mountain" friendly construction for higher level skiers in narrower widths, more people would buy them. As it is right now, it's pretty hard to find a ski under 80mm under foot that has the same construction as a ski over 80mm that also has the same shape and ability to smear when you want, carve when you want, without it folding up like a wet noodle if you push it.
That being said, we've had some very scratchy conditions as of late with a lot of very warm days (50 degrees+ on mountain, freezing overnight) and I took a peek at what people were skiing, and most were 100mm+. My go-to ski for 99% of days is an 88, but I do long for something narrower with similar construction. I have narrower skis that are a hoot on groomers, but are a handful for me off-piste.
Give me a shorter, full-camber or minimal rocker ski, sub-80mm under foot, that allows for mistakes off-piste but has some chops to it and I'd be interested. Nordica is introducing a rehashed Belle series, with some sub-80s widths, but I wonder what level those skis are targeted for. My early research indicates that only the 84 would be enough ski to make me happy.
The narrowest ski I've been on this season was 73 under foot. Man was it fun on the groomers, but too stiff for me off-piste.
haha thats me! sometimes car is less than 20 meters from lift when I ski local resort in bigger mountains we sometimes have to walk as much as 2-300 meters, such a hard life. I love SL and GS mornings before crowds hit in the mountain and people sober up from après, but you cant really go GS speeds with people around, and when the après friends wakeup, they dont really feel like going mach1, so something more mellow.@anders_nor's post about having skis in the car to match the conditions reminds me of this gem. If you can match have your skis handy, why not? I'd love to ski an hour on my SLs, then hop on my 98s and when they drop the rope get out my 120s. Power to you anders! I'll bet your friends' eyes just get wider and wider as you get them on the next condition-appropriate ski!
View attachment 127421
I loved the Augment 77 last year, although didn't get it off piste to speak of. I just can't pay a premium price for those premium skis. I've definitely discovered a love of low rocker/full camber, narrower skis that are shorter than what I normally ski.My wife is digging the Blossom N°1 Lady. She skied it well in what I would consider challenging conditions at Mt. Bachelor without a problem. It's probably not the best for off-piste but it worked for her at 67 underfoot.
Take this as an East coast perspective:Threads about 'why wide skis' usually breaks into two sub-threads. One for people east of the Mississippi (including the remainder of the Midwest) and those to the left of the Miss.
It is not as complicated as it may seem. If you ski same mountain and your car is 20m from the bottom lift station and you carry 3 pairs of ski anyway, not a problem.
Take this as an East coast perspective:
If I hear "My skis are amazing, I love them", "I suck, I am so unathletic", "I have fear issues" all from the same person odds are they are skiing some seriously fat ski on New England ice.
You just do it to make TBS look bad.I enjoy switching skis but it's not about conditions.
I switch my left and right skis if I'm thinking it's been too long since I touched up the edges..I enjoy switching skis but it's not about conditions.
I switch my left and right skis if I'm thinking it's been too long since I touched up the edges..
Pretty much this.My wife is digging the Blossom N°1 Lady. She skied it well in what I would consider challenging conditions at Mt. Bachelor without a problem. It's probably not the best for off-piste but it worked for her at 67 underfoot.
Pretty much this.
I was on the @Augment Skis AM77 on the same day and was happy at how well it handled the off piste conditions.
Granted, it wasn't a huge dump but it wasn't zoomer groomers either.