I just had the opportunity to demo the Enforcer 110, 100 and 93 in different lengths in a multitude of conditions from untracked light and moderate densities, to various forms of crud and young bumps to soft and firm groomers, over the course of two days. So the range of conditions for which I'd use the Enforcer line. I was able to switch skis from run to run, back and forth.
I own the 100 in 185 and after the demo bought the 93 in 185. The 100 and 93 are different skis, each well worth owning individually or together given criteria like mine. If they were the same except just different widths from the 100-s I wouldn't have seen the point of having both. The 100-s are turny and nimble, the 93-s charge, both with really nice tip dynamics in almost everything.
I was considering the Kastle FX 95 and SR 88 but they both got knocked off the perch by the 93-s. The 110 didn't seem to give me much that the 100 and my Moment Wildcats didn't already provide, whereas I felt like I had to have the 93-s.
It will be interesting to see what the characteristics of the new ones will be like. Changes to rocker profile in concert with width can create very different skis, judging by the three they're already selling here. I was biased against the 93-s before the demo and biased towards the SR 88-s.
Nordica's branding/product approach is interesting/curious. If it were me I'd give all my kids different names and celebrate each of them unless they were the same kid and these aren't. Then again we're already talking about the new ones and they're barely more than vapor here in the Northern Hemisphere.