A few posts here have me thinking, "NASCAR skiers be drafting."
If there's more than 5 feet I'll pass stopped skiers/riders on the woods/edge of trail side because I know they're not nearly as likely to push off in that direction. That way I give then the entire rest of the trail should they suddenly push off without looking back up hill. If the trail's wide open with no other people I'll take the other side. If there's other traffic scattered around the middle I'm passing you or them on the trail edge side rather than the middle trail side if there's any room at all there... because nobody pushes off in that direction...
Passing on the woods side for a crowded run reduces the amount of people you need to evaluate. Are they moving or not? The trees don't move and like he says, it is very unlikely that the stopped people will proceed immediately toward the trees vs. toward the middle of the run.
Not saying it is the safest/nicest way to go, just the easiest for the moving skier (who doesn't want to slow down) to evaluate.
Sadly I have seen collisions when a moving skier who didn't want to slow down passed closely to a stopped skier who moved a ski length at the wrong time resulting in a collision.
Ah, the plot thickens. Code violations (Rules 1 & 2) on the moving skier OR Code violation (Rule 4) on the skier who moved a ski length at the "wrong time" ? Both ?
I think this is the first time on this thread that I have heard about one of the ski areas actually putting out a distance guideline. It makes sense and while we all know not everyone will adhere to it at least some will.Mammoth has signs encouraging a 15' buffer.
Mammoth has signs encouraging a 15' buffer. Now, that may be for MOVING skiers/boarders as opposed to stationary, but I try and give at least that much even if it means slowing or even stopping to make it happen. I certainly don't want someone within a ski length of me if I'm moving or standing still...
A lot of this comes down to 2 things imo. Common courtesy and common sense. Unfortunately the former seems to barely exist anymore (at least over here in the northeast) where Its an all about me mindset and the new common courtesy is the middle finger. The later is something pertaining to on mountain ski etiquette and even if one (newer to the recreation) is ignorant to a lot of it you would think basic common sense would still kick in a little. But perhaps much of it doesn't because of the lack of the first one. They just don't care and its all about me.
The only forgivable people imo are those moving about who simply don't posses much ability and are not anywhere they have no business being , are trying to be careful but just lost control.
As for skiing on crowded runs and ones which do contain a lot of people who stop in bad places, who perhaps shouldn't be there, or simply just have no common sense or courtesy? Truth is that anyone with greater abilities and experience still has to adjust their skiing accordingly. Just because we may be in the right and the others may be in the wrong....you are still in the wrong if you insist on skiing how you want instead of adjusting your skiing to the atmosphere. Your still in control of your decisions and even if others are wrong its still your responsibility to curb what you want to do into what the scenario allows for you to do. When there is a collision it doesn't matter who was wrong when both parties get hurt. That part is then irrelevant .
I recall one time crossing a street and the vehicle who had a red light didn't appear to be fully stopping. And so we stopped crossing but one person from behind yells ..we have the right away" and proceeds to continue to cross. I said to him..."having the right of way isn't going to mean a thing when your carried away in an ambulance".
I thought about this a lot today out on the slopes on this busy holiday weekend. The amount of advanced skiers not wanting to adjust to the scenario are imo just as wrong as those who dont practice good on mountain etiquette and are even more wrong than those who have an honest ignorance to them.
If you drive a car on the free spirited side and you drive your car in heavy traffic you adjust accordingly. And skiing needs to be the same way.
I'm sorry but you simply cannot proceed as desired just because others or doing things poorly, wrong or incorrectly. Others being wrong doesnt make you right. In fact.....imo being more experienced and of better ability and simply knowing better, it is all the more reason you need to display more responsibility. Even if it comes at the expense of skiing how you truly wish to ski. It's just the nature of the ugly beast when skiing is crowded.
Others will be in the wrong for where they stop and how they go about things. Especially when on crowded weekend or holiday slopes. But you can be every bit as wrong and even more irresponsible when you dont curb or adjust accordingly in spite of it. Reason being because your still responsible for your own choices. And when you know the problems that plague a crowded day but still dont adjust because your fed up or feel your in the right...that's even more wrong.
It outright sucks sometimes I know. I'm with you 100%. But it is what it is. And we have to adjust even if its less fun.
Wife bitched me out again this week for getting too close to her personal space. She has a very low tolerance level for anyone near her. Spend most of my day hugging the 5 or 6 foot corridor on the side of trail harvesting any powder or playing with the bumps. When I break off my line to safely pass a stopped skier on the wide trail side all too often this skier will move out into my new line requiring another line adjustment. When I hold my line safely passing the standing skier on the narrow tree side never once have I had to readjust for a sudden moving skier. So yes I am that guy safely passing by on the tree side. In my case it is the safest place to ski.