What specific model are you trying to link to here?
My money is on this: https://www.skicatalogue.com/product-page/atomic-redster-s9-fis-w
What specific model are you trying to link to here?
Do I have to do everything for you?What specific model are you trying to link to here?
Sure, post where it is and someone else will buy it.Can someone talk me out of a Stockli FIS (165cm)? May have found one reasonably priced…
Where did you find them and do they ship to Europe?Can someone talk me out of a Stockli FIS (165cm)? May have found one reasonably priced…
No from the OP me they would be for myself. Although the way my F150 has been behaving the past few months I’m not sure it would make it from NJ to PA or that I should be buying more Stockli skis at the moment.Amphibious truck?
Still, that’s a brutal drive this time of year. We’re only a few weeks away from the Titanic anniversary.
If new, you should buy them now. If used, you run the risk of having them flexed out or having little usable edge left, depending on how they were used. But still probably a decent buy depending on the price.Can someone talk me out of a Stockli FIS (165cm)? May have found one reasonably priced…
Don't go with a Lusti or Blossom FIS or any other boutique makers--stick with vendors who have had significant documented alpine racing success: Atomic/Salomon, Dynastar/Rossignol, Head, Blizzard/Nordica, Fischer, Volkl, Van Deer, Stockli, and maybe Kastle: https://www.fis-ski.com/DB/alpine-s...asoncode=2024&disciplinecode=ALL&gendercode=A
I'm in no position to disagree with Doc, but I will anyway. If you're looking for a dedicated race slalom ski, his list of skis to consider is a good one. My experience as an old duffer who raced up to Masters with no success whatsoever but who still likes to ski on a real slalom ski is that the Blossom FIS SL is a dandy ski. Good quality and fun on the snow. Since the US no longer has a distributer new ones will be hard to find so I guess my defending them is academic. Have only touched a Lusti ski so I have no basis for an opinion about their SLs, but Phil seems impressed by Lusti generally. I won't go into the problems a "boutique" maker would face trying to get their skis on the feet of any high level ski racer.Don't go with a Lusti or Blossom FIS or any other boutique makers--stick with vendors who have had significant documented alpine racing success: Atomic/Salomon, Dynastar/Rossignol, Head, Blizzard/Nordica, Fischer, Volkl, Van Deer, Stockli, and maybe Kastle: https://www.fis-ski.com/DB/alpine-s...asoncode=2024&disciplinecode=ALL&gendercode=A
No.Are Salomon and Atomic FIS SL ski identical the same way Rossi/Dynastar are?
I can't help but wonder if more constructers would be included and meet your criteria of documented alpine racing success if the list went down to, say, Continental Cup level (at least in Europe) which is still quite elite. And covered five or ten years.Don't go with a Lusti or Blossom FIS or any other boutique makers--stick with vendors who have had significant documented alpine racing success: Atomic/Salomon, Dynastar/Rossignol, Head, Blizzard/Nordica, Fischer, Volkl, Van Deer, Stockli, and maybe Kastle: https://www.fis-ski.com/DB/alpine-s...asoncode=2024&disciplinecode=ALL&gendercode=A
Some of that information is available if one delves deeply enough into the FIS stats--no significant changes in successful major alpine racing vendors in the past 5-10 years, except obviously no Van Deer or Kastle until the past year or so, and 10+ years ago Hart and Elan still earned some paltry FIS points....
No other brands even in Continental Cups in the last 5 to 10 years? Interesting.-no significant changes in successful major alpine racing vendors in the past 5-10 years, except obviously no Van Deer or Kastle until the past year or so, and 10+ years ago Hart and Elan still earned some paltry FIS points....
"Kastle has plenty of wins tho including overall World Cup but I guess you mean recently."