Great post. I was on Epic. Been delayed a decade with domesticity. Playful charger is a bit contradictory.Flex is a red herring. The ability for the skier to bend the ski is assumed, if you can't bend the ski it's a sizing issue or a balance issue.
The idea that a ski is a charger for me but finesse for you is likewise hard to comprehend. Because...
Chargers go though the terrain. They are typified as long radius turns, stability, damp feel. They flatten 3d terrain and keep on truckin.
Playful skis go around and over the terrain. Typified as shorter radius turns, getting air time, responsive, and having snow feel. They accentuate and enhance playing with 3d terrain.
Most skis are not purpose built as chargers nor as playful skis either. So I think these terms are a bit overused in ski talk.
For example most people talk about the Mantra as a charger. But its really just a good all around ski, not something made for charging.
The so called playful charger is another thing that I really don't understand.
Maybe the Optic 114 is a playful charger? Sender squad or more traditional mounted m pro 108 would be charger pure? Probably needs to be twin to be categorized as playful.
Anyone have experience on any of the skis mentioned above to weigh in on chargey and playful longer radii skis. Probably should drift and slarve different turn shapes snow conditions permitting.