- Joined
- May 4, 2017
- Posts
- 1,142
I have a different take on what this conversation is getting at. I like to talk about our "dry land" brains and how that impacts our skiing movements. In this case, the "gravity side" of this discussion in my view is more about how our "dry land" brain wants to deal to the idea of sliding on snow. It wants to keep our feet under us to support us. Unless a skier has a lot of experience with high level skating (or possibly cycling doing sharply banked turns), they're not used to the idea of the lower half of their body not being under the upper half. This is a foreign feeling and where centripetal force, and realizing that there can be support provided by that force rather than gravity, comes into play. Doesn't Tom Gellie call this "effective gravity" (or something like that, I'm forgetting at the moment). So there is a new force that the learning skier needs to get comfortable with in how it can support them even if their feet are now out to the side.
So I guess what I'm saying is that for some skiers learning to ski, this would have to be explained to them. That this force will happen as they create sharper carved turns. They need to understand what feelings may occur and to not let those feelings cause them to back off from using the correct movements within the turn dynamics.
Very much agree with the notion of "Dry Land" Brains as well as the notion that we come to skiing with preset reactions to speed and the unknown mostly derived from experiences with straight line forces while on "Dry Land" . Add to it the notion that the act of skiing may not be as intuitive as one might think and here we are.