Added complexity. And therefore added costs and failure points.
For a feature which 99% of consumers never want and 99.5% of consumers will never use more than once.
Damn, it does feel good to be a 0.5 percenter...
Added complexity. And therefore added costs and failure points.
For a feature which 99% of consumers never want and 99.5% of consumers will never use more than once.
That last part is the real reason: no demand for them, outside of expert/elite skiers, mostly.Added complexity. And therefore added costs and failure points.
For a feature which 99% of consumers never want and 99.5% of consumers will never use more than once.
Also, take a look at Vist Speedlock bindings if you want a (almost) race level connection and tool less ability to move fore and aft. Great bindings for more racy or piste skis.I can't remember the Brand or Model name of the binding that is adjustable while in it's regular fix position. Help
Is VIST still making bindings or are they all old stock?
Only matters for clerical reasons. Maybe Augment will buy them and make them even more unavailable. Just to make sure.Does it matter? They are Italian and they don't want to sell you any; go away now
That last part is the real reason: no demand for them, outside of expert/elite skiers, mostly.
Marker kept them going because some of their elite/pro athletes use them, including skiers in house.
As far as added costs and failure points, no, not in high volume tech shops nor in my experience.
I've owned two dozen of them, still have them on all my fat skis; not a single problem in all these years of use. Not one.
Same with the high volume shop I'm associated with.
On the other hand, there are a number of bindings over the years with failure problems, that sold well, and still do.
Look Pivots, for example, are notorious for failures, and absurd costs for the resulting replacement parts/install.
This has not interfered with demand in the market place.