I was just reading some powder skiing advice from Paul Lorenz on his blog, https://www.paullorenzclinics.com/post/the-trick-to-skiing-pow-like-a-pro, and he says this, which I find intriguing: "As a skier becomes more proficient in powder, this up motion can be replaced by a “cross-under”, “down unweighted” or “absorption” style of transition. This type of transition between the turns is done by retracting or pulling the legs up under the body which reduces the load on the skis, making them lighter and easier to turn. This causes less jumping/up-down movement and subsequently less interruption to balance and makes for a smoother ride. It is however rather difficult to perform and should be used more by the advanced powder skier. "
Now, retraction turns (or whatever you want to call turns effected by flexing) are basically what I do. What should make them more difficult to do in powder than turns done by an up motion? Do others find this? And what are the advantages (if any) of an up motion instead of a flexing turn in powder?
Now, retraction turns (or whatever you want to call turns effected by flexing) are basically what I do. What should make them more difficult to do in powder than turns done by an up motion? Do others find this? And what are the advantages (if any) of an up motion instead of a flexing turn in powder?
Last edited by a moderator: