• For more information on how to avoid pop-up ads and still support SkiTalk click HERE.
Thread Starter
TS
jmeb

jmeb

Enjoys skiing.
Skier
Joined
Nov 13, 2015
Posts
4,496
Location
Colorado
Honestly, this will have a lot to do IF Pugski comes back to A-Basin for a 14th year. Being part of Ikon will help us come back.

No doubt it will help destination skiers be attracted to it.

I get their need to make money to sustain operations. Nothing is going to do that like being part of Ikon or Epic. The next closest thing would be another not-existing-pass with unlimited days at a bunch of smaller resort. And that, Powder Alliance or Mountain Collective would still be a drop in the bucket compared to Ikon / Epic.

If I had to guess their fiscal modelers realized that with a better deal from Alterra, Abasin can get a big slice of the Epic revenue with far fewer skiers.

No doubt it will be less crowded if it ends up on the Ikon than the Epic. But it would not be the same experience it would be if it went with the Loveland / Monarch model. Which is what a lot of locals were hoping for.

Ikon is not some anti-crowd pass in the Front Range. Copper was the best place to beat it last year, but WP/Mary Jane is now as packed as Vail Resort mountains.
 

Philpug

Notorious P.U.G.
Admin
SkiTalk Tester
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Posts
42,965
Location
Reno, eNVy
Which is what a lot of locals were hoping for.
It still comes down to paying the bills and being profitable...and can just the locals do that? I had a co-worker who used to say 'When they say "it's not about the money"..it's usually about the money".
 
Thread Starter
TS
jmeb

jmeb

Enjoys skiing.
Skier
Joined
Nov 13, 2015
Posts
4,496
Location
Colorado
It still comes down to paying the bills and being profitable...and can just the locals do that? I had a co-worker who used to say 'When they say "it's not about the money"..it's usually about the money".

Given that there are models of operating areas of similar acerage (1800 acres vs 1450 at Abasin) with similar lift infrastructure (8, with 1 HSQ vs 5, with 1HSQ at Abasin neither including bunny hill lifts) nearby that are profitable and do not have nearly the name recognition or money generators in food and bev -- I think there is a reasonable argument that you don't have to be on one of the megapasses to make it work.

Will they make as much money? Absolutely not.

Can they make a profitable operation? Seems possible to me.
 
Last edited:

Philpug

Notorious P.U.G.
Admin
SkiTalk Tester
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Posts
42,965
Location
Reno, eNVy
Given that there are models of operating areas of similar acerage with similar lift infrastructure nearby that are profitable and do not have nearly the name recognition or money generators in food and bev -- I think there is a reasonable argument that you don't have to be on one of the megapasses to make it work.

Will they make as much money? Absolutely not.

Can they make a profitable operation? Seems possible to me.
If your outgo is greater than your income then your upkeep is your downfall. With a lot of these smaller/independant resorts, it really depends what their nut to crack is, ie cost of operations.
 
Thread Starter
TS
jmeb

jmeb

Enjoys skiing.
Skier
Joined
Nov 13, 2015
Posts
4,496
Location
Colorado
If your outgo is greater than your income then your upkeep is your downfall. With a lot of these smaller/independent resorts, it really depends what their nut to crack is, ie cost of operations.

I have never suggested otherwise. Simply that there is a difference between maximizing profit, and being sustainable. Different businesses have different priorities. They are not necessarily the same thing.

What I have suggested is that we have a local comparable just a few miles away that is not on a mega pass, does not have the name recognition, and is chugging along fine with regular upgrades. My understanding is Abasin is still owned by a large real estate group -- that probably creates a different priorities matrix then the family-owned hill.
 

Philpug

Notorious P.U.G.
Admin
SkiTalk Tester
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Posts
42,965
Location
Reno, eNVy
I have never suggested otherwise. Simply that there is a difference between maximizing profit, and being sustainable. Different businesses have different priorities. They are not necessarily the same thing.

What I have suggested is that we have a local comparable just a few miles away that is not on a mega pass, does not have the name recognition, and is chugging along fine with regular upgrades. My understanding is Abasin is still owned by a large real estate group -- that probably creates a different priorities matrix then the family-owned hill.
I was agreeing with you.
 

SBrown

So much better than a pro
Skier
Contributor
SkiTalk Supporter
Joined
Nov 8, 2015
Posts
7,918
Location
Colorado
  • Like
Reactions: nay

Green08

Front Range Skier
Skier
Joined
Jan 23, 2018
Posts
666
Location
COS
Full Double Down (19-20 & 20-21) is now $798:
https://arapahoebasin.blogspot.com/2019/04/double-down-update.html

That's up a bit, right? I forget what I paid for my last Double Down (I think I have an 18-19 / 19-20) but I thought it was under $600.

Note: I am 100% fine with it being up a bit.
It was $599 for this season and next year back in November. So they are increasing the price significantly. 33.22203% for those who requested exact percentages.

A significant spike in season pass prices after the early offering is telling of what how they are hoping to drive revenue. How much they increase the midweek pass, up further from the current $299 will be telling. I bet the hardly adjust the midweek pass, and try and drive people in that direction while they can. Then capture $$$ people left on the table by not buying early.
 

Noodler

Sir Turn-a-lot
Skier
Joined
Oct 4, 2017
Posts
6,462
Location
Denver, CO
Looks like I will pull the trigger on the mid-week pass before May 1st. If they end up doing something with Ikon, hopefully it won't be in conflict with the mid-week pass. I just figure that if it's a weekend and I'm willing to ski, there's only one place I'm going on the Front Range... and it doesn't start with an "A". ;)
 

Green08

Front Range Skier
Skier
Joined
Jan 23, 2018
Posts
666
Location
COS
https://businessden.com/2019/04/11/...any-ski-pass-on-an-unlimited-basis-next-year/

If you trust reporting and what gets “printed” in “official” publications, then it seems the options in play are Mountain Collective and Powder Alliance.

Seems Ikon, if in play, is an option of last resort, or unmentionable at least for the moment.

I can’t think of a resort on both Powder Alliance and MCP. Powder Alliance would add days at Loveland and Monarch locally. Not sure how the finances work for either option.

Taos and Aspen are the closest MCP options. So, not sure how much synergy and skier traffic and revenue would get created. But, MCP is going to be a group willing to spend more at the resort than Monarch or Loveland skiers coming up for a few one off days.
 

SBrown

So much better than a pro
Skier
Contributor
SkiTalk Supporter
Joined
Nov 8, 2015
Posts
7,918
Location
Colorado
https://businessden.com/2019/04/11/...any-ski-pass-on-an-unlimited-basis-next-year/

If you trust reporting and what gets “printed” in “official” publications, then it seems the options in play are Mountain Collective and Powder Alliance.

Seems Ikon, if in play, is an option of last resort, or unmentionable at least for the moment.

I can’t think of a resort on both Powder Alliance and MCP. Powder Alliance would add days at Loveland and Monarch locally. Not sure how the finances work for either option.

Taos and Aspen are the closest MCP options. So, not sure how much synergy and skier traffic and revenue would get created. But, MCP is going to be a group willing to spend more at the resort than Monarch or Loveland skiers coming up for a few one off days.

Doesn't rule out the 5 or 7 days on Ikon, though, does it?
 

Noodler

Sir Turn-a-lot
Skier
Joined
Oct 4, 2017
Posts
6,462
Location
Denver, CO
Doesn't rule out the 5 or 7 days on Ikon, though, does it?

That's exactly what I'm hoping. If something does happen with Ikon it will most likely take that path. That would not be in direct conflict with my mid-week pass and would give me an option for a handful of weekend days if I need them.
 

skix

Out on the slopes
Skier
Joined
Feb 19, 2018
Posts
399
Location
...
It still comes down to paying the bills and being profitable...and can just the locals do that?

I drive from Indiana to ski there so it's not just locals. I'm sure I'm not alone in that. The place is special. Bought the Epic Local for years but you know where I kept ending up? Finally dropped the multi-mountain pass when I had 33 days in and 30 of them were at ABasin. Not even close to being bored with the terrain (or snow) available to ski there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nay

Green08

Front Range Skier
Skier
Joined
Jan 23, 2018
Posts
666
Location
COS
Doesn't rule out the 5 or 7 days on Ikon, though, does it?
No I does not directly rule out Ikon as an option. But, explicitly referencing MCP is a whole new level of public disclosure.

MCP is probably the best tool to gain visits without gaining hordes.
 

SBrown

So much better than a pro
Skier
Contributor
SkiTalk Supporter
Joined
Nov 8, 2015
Posts
7,918
Location
Colorado
No I does not directly rule out Ikon as an option. But, explicitly referencing MCP is a whole new level of public disclosure.

MCP is probably the best tool to gain visits without gaining hordes.

Ok, I see what you were saying. But MCP doesn't give 7 days, not even close, and most other partnerships give only up to 3. So Ikon is more in play than I think you're acknowledging.

I do think it was kind of an odd statement to make, because now instead of buying an ABasin pass, I'm going to wait. I guess I didn't think they would do unlimited with ANYone this year, already, so waiting for 5 or 7 days on a pass I already bought is a no-brainer. Unless, yes, you are sure you will ski more than two 4-packs' worth...
 
  • Like
Reactions: nay

Green08

Front Range Skier
Skier
Joined
Jan 23, 2018
Posts
666
Location
COS
Ok, I see what you were saying. But MCP doesn't give 7 days, not even close, and most other partnerships give only up to 3. So Ikon is more in play than I think you're acknowledging.

I do think it was kind of an odd statement to make, because now instead of buying an ABasin pass, I'm going to wait. I guess I didn't think they would do unlimited with ANYone this year, already, so waiting for 5 or 7 days on a pass I already bought is a no-brainer. Unless, yes, you are sure you will ski more than two 4-packs' worth...
Previous posts I had said earlier comments on Al’s blog made it sound like Ikon was in play. I agree that you only mention 8 days if seven is a relevant number.

However, after all the blister of the divorce with Vail, jumping to Ikon seems out of sorts. I simply think that PR has said that as long as Ikon is a 1% chance if pass sales go belly up, then they need to speak in words that won’t come back to bite them in the butt.

I also agree that A-Basin hinting and hedging in public is probably also keeping just as many folks on the fence, as it is helping move pass sales.

MCP makes the most sense for an extra partnership, while also keeping the number as clean from other counting errors and skier day swapping as they can.

This is a big next year for A-Basin. If nothing else for them to gather data and figure out what might be the baseline interest in the resort as an independent.
 

nay

dirt heel pusher
Skier
Joined
Dec 1, 2015
Posts
6,516
Location
Colorado
If your outgo is greater than your income then your upkeep is your downfall. With a lot of these smaller/independant resorts, it really depends what their nut to crack is, ie cost of operations.

I think we are vastly over complicating this. Loveland’s lots, and by that I mean the main lot and the 3 smaller lots at Loveland Valley where you can take a shuttle to Loveland Basin, have been packed this season.

I cannot remember a single day where they didn’t have lot attendants directing traffic into the tightest possible configuration in order to maximize every square foot of dirt. No Epic, no Ikon, no MCP, and a lesser brand name than A-Basin. They get maybe a third of the social media hits that A-Basin gets.

Loveland is a significantly more disperse mountain than A-Basin. It has a third more acreage and a considerably greater amount of terrain that has to be consistently avy controlled. I don’t see how it is reasonable that A-Basin is more expensive to operate than Loveland, and I could see those costs being half for a much more compact mountain that isn’t essentially primarily avalanche terrain.

A-Basin is unique in that their COO runs a social media blog. We get more information directly from Al than we can get across Vail or Alterra’s entire portfolio. I think that makes us susceptible to reading the tea leaves.

Does anybody really believe that A-Basin’s limited parking is going to sit idle next season? If you do, I can’t imagine a better reason to buy a season pass for next season, because that will be a a modern day experience that will get wiped off the map as quickly as Al can say “blog”.
 

Coach13

Making fresh tracks
Skier
Joined
Nov 15, 2015
Posts
2,091
Location
No. VA
Looks like I will pull the trigger on the mid-week pass before May 1st. If they end up doing something with Ikon, hopefully it won't be in conflict with the mid-week pass. I just figure that if it's a weekend and I'm willing to ski, there's only one place I'm going on the Front Range... and it doesn't start with an "A". ;)

I’m pretty sure I’ve said this here before but if I lived in the surrounding Denver area it would be the rare occasion I’d drive past Loveland for a day trip further west on I70.
 

Sponsor

Top