Gawd I love that bike. 853....
And the crankset looks like 40t to me. 1x. Not low enough.
For up-to-12-15% fire roads and limited loads, I honestly don't see the problem.
I envy your fitness level Mr. Vingegaard.
I'm using a 34x34 as my low right now and I'm good at 6-8% for 1-1.5kms. After that, tough! But I'm a fat old man and I'm pretty sure @Wendy is pretty fit. I think it really depends on the roads and rider..
Tubeless?
If I'm riding within Santa Fe proper, it's actually fairly flat. It'll be awhile before I acclimate to the altitude (nearly 7000' in town) so no real climbing yet anyways. It's also going to be used as a "ride to the farmer's market bike" on Saturdays.Not low enough for what? Moving slower than walking?
It's a gravel bike.
She's not going to be doing super-technical climbs at 18%-20% and it's not a bikepacking bike where she'll load it with 60kg+ of cr@p.
For up-to-12-15% fire roads and limited loads, I honestly don't see the problem.
The biggest problem I foresee with that setup is - goatheads. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tribulus_terrestris
I was set on a steel frame gravel bike. Ended up with a carbon fork which felt better on rough roads. Still can attach panniers to this fork if I want.Gawd I love that bike. 853....
When I saw that on the top tube, I thought, "This is the bike for me!" So cool, and so funny.True story. Back in the very early 2000s, pre-Niner, I was a regular contributor to MTBR.com, a mountain bike discussion forum. At the time I had a strip of electrical tape on my toptube with "Pedal Dammit!" written on it with a sharpie. I posted a pic of that on MTBR, and I'm convinced that's where Niner got the idea. Sadly I no longer have the pic. But I do like the bikes.
I'll just point out that the Raleigh Super GP upthread has 42x28 for a low gear ... and all I got was a seat position comment
I'm using a 34x34 as my low right now and I'm good at 6-8% for 1-1.5kms. After that, tough! But I'm a fat old man and I'm pretty sure @Wendy is pretty fit. I think it really depends on the roads and rider..
Yup, shop here said they only sell tubeless because so many thorns.
I was set on a steel frame gravel bike. Ended up with a carbon fork which felt better on rough roads. Still can attach panniers to this fork if I want.
You are not a lady
Only way to not go completely nuts is to be able to spin it.
yes, shop said repairs are way easier with tubeless here.On the upside, tubeless also makes repair with a rack (or fenders ftm) a lot easier.
I'm sure you're already aware rack loads and fork loads do weird things to bike handling.
You calling me a slut? Wait... (counts bikes. counts frames) ...OK, you're probably right.
...with an e-bike motor
I mean, if you can't spin the gear...Totally. I have it too on my road bike but on the gravel I ride routes where 8% for 2 km is only the warm up. Like 44 km constant ascent with the last 10 or so with long sections firmly into the double digits. Only way to not go completely nuts is to be able to spin it.
That’s why I am considering a Roubaix as everyday bike and will keep the Leo for gravel/adventure riding. With 40-45 mm tires it will be superb.
True story. Back in the very early 2000s, pre-Niner, I was a regular contributor to MTBR.com, a mountain bike discussion forum. At the time I had a strip of electrical tape on my toptube with "Pedal Dammit!" written on it with a sharpie. I posted a pic of that on MTBR, and I'm convinced that's where Niner got the idea. Sadly I no longer have the pic. But I do like the bikes.
On the upside, tubeless also makes repair with a rack (or fenders ftm) a lot easier.
For bikes-absolutely not.
Plus I dont like BMC