Heres's what that article says.
https://www.unionleader.com/news/bu...cle_f4668aa8-0a4b-5778-9e16-ab8f1940f274.html
"A U.S. Department of Labor inspector has questioned Gunstock Mountain Resort’s practice of allowing teen ski instructors to assist students onto ski lifts, maintaining that by lowering the safety bar, the instructors are effectively “operating” the lift."
I think this means the teens are standing there next to the liftie, or have replaced the liftie, and they lower the bar from the side of the chair as kids too short to reach the bar themselves ride up. This is the liftie's job. The teens are doing the liftie's job. They are not riding the lift themselves with the kids, but standing next to the chair putting down the occasional bar when short kids can't reach the bar themselves. If I'm right, then this reasonably qualifies as "youths tending motorized equipment."
The additional part where the article says
"The inspector also questioned the practice of allowing 14- to 15-year-old employees to ride the lift unaccompanied" is hard to believe. As we all know, teenagers ride lifts safely all the time unaccompanied. Little kids do too, but they need someone to lower the bar for them. Teens are tall enough and mature enough to not need any assistance at all. Why would they be disallowed from riding a lift alone?
Did the inspector really "question" the practice of "allowing" teens to ride the lift alone? That sentence was written by the reporting journalist. I'm thinking the journalist is not a skier and simply read the source material wrong, leading to a misinterpretation. If the inspector actually was worried about employed teens riding the lift alone, then at least the inspector qualified it as a "question" and not a declaration.