OK, a little detour here: There seems to be a lot of love for SV on this thread so maybe this is the place to investigate. I visited several years ago for two days of skiing and found the mountain not much to my liking. It seemed to me that a lot of the runs were subtly (or not so subtly) concave, so that the overall effect was a bit like skiing all the time in a half-pipe. It appeared to me that most of the cut runs ran in gulley's rather than on ridges or faces. Personally, I really don't like that kind of skiing; I'd much rather ski on a flat or even convex surface which (to me) allows for a greater variety of turn shape and size.
Am I wrong? Or is there skiing I didn't find (although I felt like I explored pretty fully)? Does more snow fill in the terrain more fully? It is admittedly, a personal preference, but after I visited, I felt no real need to return. Thoughts/comments?
BTW, I would second the commentary that SV has some of the steepest green runs I've found anywhere. Seattle Ridge did not feel like "beginner" terrain.