For Sale Dynamic VR17 NOS Skis

[morevert]

1970's vintage, Salomon 505 bindings, never skied on, 167cm, mint condition. Width dimensions Tip/Waist/Tail, 81.3/63.4/72.4 mm. Thickness 8.0/17.0/8.0 mm.You would have needed to be a pretty hot 100-120 lb Junior to skied these confidently back in the day. Graphics are the same height as a pair of 204cm VR17's from similar year. Shipping no problem.
$1000.00 or Best Offer

 

[crgildart]

Would the 167cm be a junior model?

 

[Bill Talbot]

If you moved the decimal place to the left you'd be in the ballpark.

 

[James]

Would the 167cm be a junior model?

My junior skis at 13-14ish were raise your arm above your head. Ski length at fingertips. Pretty sure it was longer than 167, but don’t remember. They were just skis back then.

 

[Brad J]

@11 I had a pair of Hart Holidays 170 cm or 175 cm and I was about 5’5 and 75 lbs soaking wet , They seamed the right length . My learning curve was step on those ski’s

 

[crgildart]

My junior skis at 13-14ish were raise your arm above your head. Ski length at fingertips. Pretty sure it was longer than 167, but don’t remember. They were just skis back then.

They're certainly not adult size

 

[Roundturns]

Wow pure nostalgia. The 167 cm length is weird. If I had and never do have $1,000 dollars laying around I did not know what to do with, I would be tempted if the length was at least 200 cm and the bindings were 505.
Still pretty neat blast from the past conjuring up great memories. Loved that ski I never owned and the Head XR-1 from the same era also never owned.

 

[Bad Bob]

Will trade you 2 roles of single ply for them.

 

[Uncle-A]

Would the 167cm be a junior model?

I would think so if the graphics on the ski was smaller. The larger graphics seem to indicate the adult model. You might have to put it next to a 167 ski that is an adult ski to compare thickness, the Jr. Ski will be much thinner the adult will be thicker.

 

[James]

Will trade you 2 roles of single ply for them.

Single ply. Lowballer!
You’re going to have to throw in some hand sanitizer. And maybe a face mask.

 

[Bad Bob]

Single ply. Lowballer!
You’re going to have to throw in some hand sanitizer. And maybe a face mask.

would if they were longer,

 

[markojp]

Would the 167cm be a junior model?

Yes. I had a pair.

 

[noncrazycanuck]

have well used pair of 200's with 502 bindings in garden shed.
Bottle of wine and shipping there your's

 

[Uncle-A]

Yes. I had a pair.

Did they have the same graphics or were they the smaller graphics?

 

[Uncle-A]

It is an odd combination, that short of a ski with a Salomon 505E that was the higher/race setting binding. Really a mismatch if I ever saw one.

 

[markojp]

This was when I was in 4th-5th grade... forgive me if I don't remember. Yes, the binding is a bit weird for a jr. ski, and yes, I'm certain it was a jr. ski. Race skis at that time started at about 180-185 for women's skis.

 

[morevert]

Graphics are the same height as a pair of my 204cm VR17's from similar year

 

[Uncle-A]

Graphics are the same height as a pair of my 204cm VR17's from similar year

It probably isn't a Jr. Ski if the graphics are the same.

 

[markojp]

They were very close from what I remember, and I still don't believe there weren't any adult race skis sold in anything that short. I thought they were about the coolest ski a kid could have... I mean J.C. won three golds on them.

 

[Doug Briggs]

It is an odd combination, that short of a ski with a Salomon 505E that was the higher/race setting binding. Really a mismatch if I ever saw one.

I kind of thought that, too. I wonder if they were pair of skis for window dressing in a shop. Short to fit. High end model because...