Enjoyed reading through this thread again so will bump it up with an update. In January 2020 moved on from my 2011 Twisters (65mm at boot 168cm) to a midfat, the Nordica 2020 Santa Ana 88's at 165cm. A gal friend about my size was on some Black Pearl 88's and seemed fine skiing bumps smoothly that got me interested as I would welcome a model that also allowed wider skiing across the mountain. So after Tricia and Amy provided positive reviews that seemed to fit that need, I purchased that model and within a few days with some adjustments knew I'd found my next primary ski. For a few days I didn't think it was better in bumps than the Twisters, however with more days in being a bigger tool, I've taken my bump skiing up to another level of smoothness. On fresh powder days though ain't nearly as fun as my 173cm 2012 Rossi S7's (112mm at boot), I can still lay down fine SSS tracks. And is definitely with its greater width is more a tool and fun on groomed, firmer, and uneven snow.
Thus can recommend it to at least other lighter men and women that already have recreational mogul skiing skills instead of wondering where to move onto with the lack of mogul skis. On November 24, my single day of skiing this pandemic winter, after a couple warmup runs down a 1k groomed run, on my third run, first bump run of this season for this senior after not skiing for 7+ months, and in just modest physical condition, was able to smoothy ski non-stop the fall line 850 feet of vertical down intermediate and advanced bumps that says much to how my mind has grown into the ski. The above noted, as someone without experience on other midfat skis, I would expect there are also some other midfats that can supply a similar rec bump experience.
but no problem there either.