it isn't straight down..
and.. the ride up is a lot longer than the ride down..
Yeah, definitely need faster lifts!
it isn't straight down..
and.. the ride up is a lot longer than the ride down..
Mass is a big part of the equation but it isn't 'everything'. Aerodynamics (skill and preparation) is probably more important. I'd lay money on a light guy in a tuck over a heavy guy standing upright. Ski/snow contact is a huge factor. If you are on your edges (skill) or have a bad structure or bad wax (preparation).
BTW, my remark above about elevation to @ScotsSkier is a joke. I'm not doubting he went 80+ fully clothed freeskiing DH skis in a closed arena. I just thought it funny that his ski tracks included time in his truck. He was quite likely skiing faster than he was driving.
@Philpug, I had to google Doc Hudson but I still don't get the connection? I've not watched the Cars movies.
Yup. Aerodynamics is definitely important at these speeds. I could feel the additional dragecompared to being in a speed suit. Why we do not usually let athletes train for speed now without stripping down to speedsuits. If they want to limit their speeds in the beginning iprefer to have them stand up rather than wearing jacket and pants. That way they ease into it better and don’t get a huge shock from the additional speed when they are in a course in A speedsuit.
And I definitely do not claim the level of skill on speed skis that @Doug Briggs has. In this instance they were simply pointed down hill - oh and it was not a closed/netted arena, just was able to catch a quiet spell on the hill!
Are you going to the aspen FIS races or mammoth nationals Doug?
So it takes between 5 and 10 seconds (depending on how often you turn) to complete a run! Must be fun
His 'hill' must be a cliff for 300' vertical to equate to 5 seconds per run.
That'd be about right.. *sigh* One day i'll move to the mountains.. Gotta be some good IT jobs in.. i dunno.. Lake Louise or Whistler..You’re right. Also, if it were a cliff he’d probably be averaging more than 38.5 mph in free fall. Revising my error and assuming a 15 degree average slope angle and reasonable turn frequency and shape, it would take about 30 seconds top to bottom. Now we’re talking skiing!
Mass is a big part of the equation but it isn't 'everything'. Aerodynamics (skill and preparation) is probably more important. I'd lay money on a light guy in a tuck over a heavy guy standing upright. Ski/snow contact is a huge factor. If you are on your edges (skill) or have a bad structure or bad wax (preparation).
BTW, my remark above about elevation to @ScotsSkier is a joke.
The most accurate thing in my life is my own fun meter.GPS based app are highly inaccurate....
I just noticed four people voted for top speeds that exceed the speeds of some guys in Sun Peaks in the open class (FIS DH gear, not S1).
I was limited to checking 90-99. It was as close to ludicrous as I could get.
(At the shop a few winters ago at the end of a long, busy day, a customer who was looking for a new ski asked what might be good. He was a self professed intermediate who averaged "68mph". I walked him over to the SG and DH skis. He then admitted 68 probably wasn't entirely accurate.)