The Disney comparisons are intriguing but I'm not sure appropriate for skiing. There has to be a reasonable limit for lift ticket prices in order for the sport to be sustainable. I don't think that issue applies to amusement parks, particularly those owned by the giant rat. Kids have constant in your face online, TV and movie marketing from Disney and to a lesser extent Universal. Parents will continue to spend ridiculous sums to take their kids to those parks. If you look at amusement parks that are less of a destination, but still market a full days fun and adventure, the day pass/ season pass cost ratio is significantly different. At most Six Flags parks, a season pass is available at 1.5-2x the cost of a day ticket.
I don't think skiing as we know it is sustainable with $200 day tickets. Sure, VR and Alterra still have lines at the ticket windows at these prices, but they likely won't forever. EPIC / IKON passes don't appeal to new skiers, even if a relative value (would love to see data on passes sold to those who haven't skied before), and that day ticket + rentals + food gouging still presents a bit of sticker shock.
Personally, I refuse to spend over $100 on a day ticket. Got a 5 day trip to Ogden planned for the second week of Feb. Gonna use the 3 days at PowMow from my Loveland Pass and would like to ski Snowbasin too. If I can find tix for under $100 I will, if not, I'll play for a day at little Nordic Valley. Can I afford the Snowbasin walk up or online tix? Sure. Am I going to spend that? Nope.
Not just Disney, Sea World, Universal Studios...but also the cost of tickets to attend a sporting event, the cost to participate in other sports such as golf,...they are all reasonable comparisons. As it relates to season passes at amusement parks, the percentage of people who visit multiple times (per year) is much, much less than the percentage who ski multiple times per year.
$200 window tickets are sustainable as long as the value is there - conditions, facilities, non-skiing activities.... Neither Vail nor Alterra are looking to cater to the masses. That is not their business plan. They do not want to be the Toyota, Chevy or Volkswagen of the ski industry. They want to be the BMW, Cadillac or Lexus. And the same way those companies are successful in the auto industry, there is no reason why Vail and Alterra cannot not be successful in their industry.
Of course someone who has not skied before is not likely to be looking to buy a season pass. Vail and Alterra are focused on folks buying a pass after trying the sport for a season. When they become "skiers" and start skiing 6-12+ days per season, start spending money on equipment, start skiing with family and friends, perhaps even buy a ski house...in other words when their commitment to the sport grows. After all, a season pass is basically predicated on that - a commitment to the sport.
Both Vail and Alterra have iconic enough mountains that there will always be demand for window tickets, either from folks with other season passes or casual skiers who do not have a season pass. The same way there are plenty of folks paying for one day Yankee or Lakers tickets rather than buying season tickets.
You seem to have figured it out. Ski at non Vail or Alterra mountains and you are likely not to encounter any of the concerns you bring up. You have over 420 mountains to choose from! Going backto my car analogy, you don't need to spend the money on a Mercedes to get a nice car. You don't need to spend the money at a Vail or Alterra resort to enjoy have a great skiing experience.
By the way, walk-up window prices seem steep just about everywhere. I just looked at Killington and a ticket for Saturday is $100 even if you buy it online ahead of time - their single mountain unlimited adult season pass is now $1,200. Jiminy Peak, a much smaller mountain, is selling their an online advanced ticket for this Saturday for $80 - their single-mountain unlimited adult season pass for $1,050. Neither is owned by Vail or Alterra.