• For more information on how to avoid pop-up ads and still support SkiTalk click HERE.

mmcshane

Pugski Lurker
Skier
Joined
Dec 21, 2018
Posts
33
So, I misread pacer last week- the creditors committee had not filed anything (the US Trustee accidentally filed 2 of the same motions, one was a draft and I wasn't paying attention to who filed what) Anyway, the creditors committee filed this morning OBJECTING to expedited hearing on the US Trustee's motion. They think it will just prolong things and cost more for everyone involved. They must be hopeful that there will be a real sale on the 19th.
 

Attachments

  • Objection to motion.pdf
    233.1 KB · Views: 20

skidrew

Getting off the lift
Skier
Joined
May 1, 2017
Posts
646
We feel this is a very important discussion and we felt it should be kept open, but not at all cost, there will be a very short lesh though.

How about deleting (offending) posts and banning repeat offenders?
 

Philpug

Notorious P.U.G.
Admin
SkiTalk Tester
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Posts
42,883
Location
Reno, eNVy
How about deleting (offending) posts and banning repeat offenders?
We will do what we have to do. If that is uninviting people to participate so be it. But also we do not discuss specific moderating policies in public but remember Pugski.com's simple posting guidelines.
  • Rule 1: Don't be an ass.
  • Rule 2: Being overly sensitive is also being an ass
  • Rule 2a: Phil and Tricia decide who is being an ass.
 

Snomotion

In the parking lot (formerly "At the base lodge")
Skier
Joined
Oct 6, 2019
Posts
1
Location
Virginia
So, I misread pacer last week- the creditors committee had not filed anything (the US Trustee accidentally filed 2 of the same motions, one was a draft and I wasn't paying attention to who filed what) Anyway, the creditors committee filed this morning OBJECTING to expedited hearing on the US Trustee's motion. They think it will just prolong things and cost more for everyone involved. They must be hopeful that there will be a real sale on the 19th.
So at this point are their any bidders since the stalking horse bidder dropped out ?
 
Thread Starter
TS
Dr. Bighair

Dr. Bighair

Dr. Style
Skier
Joined
Nov 9, 2018
Posts
78
I have heard rumors of another group interested in bidding and wouldn't be surprised if the would have been stalking horse jumped back in, but that is pure speculation and rumor at this point. I think we are close enough now to the auction that everyone is going to be tight lipped. There is no need to make public plans to bid since the hurtz's actions have pushed this into a straight up auction. Now there is no requirement for communication from bidders to bankruptcy court and no leaking.

It's just a spreadsheet numbers game for bidders at this point. To me picking it up is the easy part...it's what comes after the purchase that matters. 10 mil investment gets a buyer back to where the place left off 5 years ago and ends up it bankruptcy in another couple years, 20 million puts the place back in "competition" mode with Canaan and the 2 1/2 month season, 30 million gets the place on par with most all of the other resorts in the mid-A, and 40 million gives snowshoe a run for their money with a true four season resort.

At one time t-line did 100k skiers a year...which I think with the new highway could grow to a 120k -150k number easily with modern facilities, modern infrastructure, and a full season from Thanksgiving to 1st of April. Multiply that skier count by a modest 100 dollars revenue per skier for seasonal ski season revenue. Subtract the overhead, labor burden, and other cost of business. The numbers work as long as the ability to invest, carry the cost until payback, and most importantly to manage and promote a resort is there. That doesn't even include revenue from the possibility of making it a true four season resort.
 

32Porkchop

In the parking lot (formerly "At the base lodge")
Skier
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Posts
2
I have heard rumors of another group interested in bidding and wouldn't be surprised if the would have been stalking horse jumped back in, but that is pure speculation and rumor at this point. I think we are close enough now to the auction that everyone is going to be tight lipped. There is no need to make public plans to bid since the hurtz's actions have pushed this into a straight up auction. Now there is no requirement for communication from bidders to bankruptcy court and no leaking.

It's just a spreadsheet numbers game for bidders at this point. To me picking it up is the easy part...it's what comes after the purchase that matters. 10 mil investment gets a buyer back to where the place left off 5 years ago and ends up it bankruptcy in another couple years, 20 million puts the place back in "competition" mode with Canaan and the 2 1/2 month season, 30 million gets the place on par with most all of the other resorts in the mid-A, and 40 million gives snowshoe a run for their money with a true four season resort.

At one time t-line did 100k skiers a year...which I think with the new highway could grow to a 120k -150k number easily with modern facilities, modern infrastructure, and a full season from Thanksgiving to 1st of April. Multiply that skier count by a modest 100 dollars revenue per skier for seasonal ski season revenue. Subtract the overhead, labor burden, and other cost of business. The numbers work as long as the ability to invest, carry the cost until payback, and most importantly to manage and promote a resort is there. That doesn't even include revenue from the possibility of making it a true four season resort.
Respectfully disagree with the $ investments. Maybe Dr. Bighair (who I know knows this resort and I respect his judgment) was just using fake numbers to make his point, but, $6.5M got Laurel Mtn. back into the business and based on my own skiing experience there, they'll be around long after I die, unless Nutting decides to kill it and he sure as heck ain't subsidizing it. Smart $ invested the right way. It'll be around for a long time, especially given altitude and proximity now with Corridor H to the DC market. My wish is that the next investor buys it cheap and still has the $ to invest to ensure its long term survival.
 
Thread Starter
TS
Dr. Bighair

Dr. Bighair

Dr. Style
Skier
Joined
Nov 9, 2018
Posts
78
Ha, another tslimer chimes in. We are getting close to quorum numbers here. But, no fake numbers. I think my numbers are round...but good, and they would work.
 

Mook21

Booting up
Skier
Joined
Nov 9, 2018
Posts
17
Location
Winchester, Va
For T-Line to become 4 seasons is not a stretch. They have a core of downhill mountain bike trails and could expand working with Whitegrass and Canaan to have an amazing set of mountain bike cross country trails to compliment T-Line's gravity / downhill trails. Canaan is already investing heavily in mountain bike trails, opening 3-4 miles of professionally built flow style trails this year. Canaan Valley was one of the original homes to epic mountain bike riding but has fallen down and lost that place of prominence BUT the core trails are still there. Mountain being is much like skiing, expensive. Actually even more expensive with a "good" XC bike going for $3k+ and enduro bikes going for $4k+
 

crgildart

Gravity Slave
Skier
Joined
Nov 12, 2015
Posts
16,450
Location
The Bull City
Respectfully disagree with the $ investments. Maybe Dr. Bighair (who I know knows this resort and I respect his judgment) was just using fake numbers to make his point, but, $6.5M got Laurel Mtn. back into the business and based on my own skiing experience there, they'll be around long after I die, unless Nutting decides to kill it and he sure as heck ain't subsidizing it. Smart $ invested the right way. It'll be around for a long time, especially given altitude and proximity now with Corridor H to the DC market. My wish is that the next investor buys it cheap and still has the $ to invest to ensure its long term survival.
Laurel Mountain has ONE lift and limited snow making capabilities. The lodge is also pretty small. Great little place but hardly a destination..
 

pipestem

Out on the slopes
Skier
Joined
Nov 8, 2018
Posts
644
I'll take one lift, 50% coverage of completely reliable snow making, and bike trail maintenance for 9 million, Alex.
 

crgildart

Gravity Slave
Skier
Joined
Nov 12, 2015
Posts
16,450
Location
The Bull City
I'll take one lift, 50% coverage of completely reliable snow making, and bike trail maintenance for 9 million, Alex.
Me too along with 5,000 other folks from DC day trippers to NC weekenders packing those cheap slopeside houses. Good luck with the line to that one lift.
 

pipestem

Out on the slopes
Skier
Joined
Nov 8, 2018
Posts
644
And and ...furthermore, lets imagine that the orange lift is unrecoverable. Replace it with a fixed grip quad. Now lets imagine that silver queen is unrecoverable. Remove the rope and chairs, it can be replaced later if needed. Let's get to needed first. Like lets open trails.

All this is nonsense, but its lunchtime.
 

pipestem

Out on the slopes
Skier
Joined
Nov 8, 2018
Posts
644
Me too along with 5,000 other folks from DC day trippers to NC weekenders packing those cheap slopeside houses. Good luck with the line to that one lift.

Nah, I think the brand is damaged and will take some time to recover. When we get to that level then we can leverage a new lift.
 

crgildart

Gravity Slave
Skier
Joined
Nov 12, 2015
Posts
16,450
Location
The Bull City
If it were up to me I'd just get the snow guns working and drop three rope tows across the mountain and call it good to go! I'd book a trip there this season if they could get that far.
 

Kemperski

Getting on the lift
Skier
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Posts
122
Since we're in hypothetical mode I agree -- if I could have top to bottom skiing I'd happily pay for whatever could get me to the top, maybe not rope tow, that would be an long haul but two t'bars or a poma and beginner rope tow -- hellyes.

One of the great things about t-line, and Whitegrass and Canaan is how little snow it actually takes for trails and even glades to be skiable. again let's hope something can happen so that they can be maintained and not wait to be completely overgrown
 

mmcshane

Pugski Lurker
Skier
Joined
Dec 21, 2018
Posts
33
Few quick updates- there is a hearing tomorrow morning re: appointment of Chapter 11 trustee.
Creditors committee filed objection to debtor's request to employ special counsel re: possible claims against Neely- that hearing is schedule for 12/11. I recommend reading the objection- sorta sums up how everyone probably felt when they read the request in the first place.
 

Attachments

  • Objection to employ special counsel.pdf
    113 KB · Views: 64
Last edited:

dbostedo

Asst. Gathermeister
Moderator
Contributor
SkiTalk Supporter
Joined
Feb 9, 2016
Posts
18,331
Location
75% Virginia, 25% Colorado
Few quick updates- there is a hearing tomorrow morning re: appointment of Chapter 11 trustee.
Creditors committee filed objection to debtor's request to employ special counsel re: possible claims against Neely- that hearing is schedule for 12/11. I recommend reading the objection- sorta sums up how everyone probably felt when they read the request in the first place.

I love this statement from that objection as a summary, in my opinion, of the whole mess:

"Indeed, the application to retain special counsel to investigate malpractice and breach of fiduciary claims against third-parties appears fully consistent with the Debtors’ management’s steadfast refusal to accept any responsibility whatsoever for the vast operating and financial issues that caused the Debtors to shutter their Resort and file bankruptcy and, instead, foist blame on just about anyone, other than themselves."
 

skidrew

Getting off the lift
Skier
Joined
May 1, 2017
Posts
646
Few quick updates- there is a hearing tomorrow morning re: appointment of Chapter 11 trustee.
Creditors committee filed objection to debtor's request to employ special counsel re: possible claims against Neely- that hearing is schedule for 12/11. I recommend reading the objection- sorta sums up how everyone probably felt when they read the request in the first place.

While sloppily written, the sloppiness almost makes it more persuasive as a "This is so ridiculous it's not even worth proper formatting and careful drafting" legal argument.
 
Top