jed you are mixing metaphors looking for an absolute, where one does not exist. the length of the lever arm nor the strength or build, trump the action of the range of motion in the ankle joint. with one exception that could have to do with how tall you make the cuff to the height of the leg. ( thats another discussion, although cuff height I'm most boots is fully adjustable in either direction )
hyper mobile calls for limiting boot flex to prevent the skier that has the greater range from using the greater range. The boot is not a cast to put you in position, rather an early warning system to help guide you into staying in position. Hyper mobile ankle will have the skier struggling to find home base in the area of fore-aft balance. Limiting the shell flex and properly matching the pressure loading on the front of the leg, will help the early warning system to keep you in better balance. It will also help to reduce that pesky bleeding that keeps taking place on your shin, as well as those toasted quads that have you pulling off to the side of the run so you can lean on your poles and recover.
indicators on the hill show in the form of odd angles of the body in the sagittal plane. excessive forward position of the knees, counter balancing with a swayed back to compensate, creating odd angles in the frontal plane that sometimes appear to be under canting, as the skier throws more english to attempt to gain edge control higher in the turn, etc.
this is why the heart and sole of fore-aft balance comes from ramp angle, and it is not enough to just get the net angle correct. You must also match the flex of the shell and the fit of the cuff around the lower leg to prevent the skier from adapting compensatory moves from the ministry of silly walks...
the boot set up does not care if you are dense, or what the length of your lever arm is
you are setting the boots ramp, forward lean and flex to best direct your skis to cooperate as you move through space. the better these steps are accomplished the more efficient and proficient the skier can be...
bud, ultimately the skier will tell you their preference for flex many times based on information that does not compute with what you see as the boot fitter...On no,i cannot possibly ski in a 110 flex my friend that is a ski instructor told me I need a 100 flex because I am ( okay fill in the blank... ) fat? skinny? a little touched?, low iq?, high iq?, a little flamboyant? As fitters we have the responsibility to walk the skier into the right flexing boot for the action of their ankle so they can progress. to be clear what i am disagreeing with is that the flex of the boot should not always "still depends on their abilities and preferences" as you stated in your last post. that is if all things are equal in the boot guys ability to read all of the tea leaves in front of him.
chris is asking the right questions in his last post...most definitely sorting of the geometry will give you resolution. tall order for boot fitters that cannot do proper assessment and math, and have no clue how the boot fits around the instep/ankle area.
IMHO i am going to go out on a limb here to say that we all agree that the majority of recreational skiers are skiing in boots that are too big. I am going to add another market standard that needs to be addressed. For skiers that have either limited dorsiflexion of the ankle or excessive dorsiflexion of the ankle, the majority of those skiers are skiing in boots that are too soft!