It is a ski brand and specifically a model. Link is in the initial post. Small company building skis in Vermont.Not familiar with that name, is it a ski or a new model?
Don't trash that box.
Yeh, especially if they managed some sort of super low temperature compensation.I don't know about the skis themselves, but that box looks like it would be good for at least 10 uses. Nice!
As a (mostly) lapsed polymer engineer, I'm very intrigued about the use of their "HDT" material in skis.
And I love me some sidecut, so even more intrigued.
But at $1,300 MSRP, my Rock Magnet tendencies will probably by a limiting factor.
The skis have camber, the box does not.Is it the photo or does that box have zero camber?
My super bros hold an edge better than anything else in my quiver 91mm waist and 30 meter sidecut they are not my everyday ski but it hold on hard snow far better than my GS skis.
There have been many days this year where my 81 mm waisted full camber X powers late in the day were a chore and my 88mm Brahmas with tip and tail rocker were easier to hook up in the weird sugary snow.
I agree whole-heartedly that skinny carvers are a lot of work on afternoon "groomers" with random sugar piles everywhere.
91mm waist holds better than GS race skis though? That would seem to defy some physics. Are the GS skis just too much of a one-trick pony that doing anything other than a GS turn feels awful on them and your super-bros have some forgiveness built in so they feel better?
I don't think they every got made, we had them on the order forms but the cost to make them was in the $6K range per mold and there wasn't enough orders.Fuelie bosses exist in a 185 and 175..... they are basically impossible to find though.
91mm waist holds better than GS race skis though? That would seem to defy some physics.