Tell me your experiences with these "resort powder" skis.

[Tom K.]

I'm moving from a 3 ski quiver (Atomic Vantage 83 CTI, Enforcer 93, Backland 109) to a 2 ski quiver of Enforcer 88 and Enforcer 104.

If I had it to do over again, I would get those two (Enforcer 88 and 104) and live (ski) happily ever after.

Now, I am feeling pretty good about adding the Head Supershape i.Titan 80...

Am I the only one that doesn't think the "classic" Enforcers (88, 93 and 100) ski anything at all like the FR versions (104 and 110)?

Cuz I don't, at least on the 110 (have not taken a lap on the 104s).

W/R/T to the Magnums. I've got a pair. They are a great ski. But they do not speak to me. No "joy of life" feeling, and they DO prefer a pretty high speed to truly come alive. But plenty of others love them.

 

[markojp]

Well, they don't because the 104 and 110 are very different designs.

 

[DocGKR]

I've had several Enforcers. The 88 and 104 have a similar feeling to me, that differs a bit from the old 100 and 110.

 

[BMC]

Not so much that 112 is Overkill, but the dps sucks in cut up powder.

Niseko powder?

Be that as it may, I have the 104’s for when it’s not crazy deep. There’s the whole point of a quiver!!

 

[anders_nor]

resort pow tomorrow and monday, bringing enforcer 110mm, CT 3.0 108mm, ranger 102mm FR, bent chetler 100mm