Colorado Steamboat's New Gondi shaves 4 minutes off time

Ron

Seeking the next best ski
Pugski Ski Tester
Joined
Nov 8, 2015
Posts
6,888
Location
Steamboat Springs, Co
Thread Starter
TS
Ron

Ron

Seeking the next best ski
Pugski Ski Tester
Joined
Nov 8, 2015
Posts
6,888
Location
Steamboat Springs, Co
I guess that makes the WiFi a little less useful... :rolleyes::D
LOL, yeah, like we needed Wifi for even a 10 minute ride??? Cell coverage there is excellent BTW..... I'm betting this was some kind of free or really low-cost option. Maybe it was part of an overall system used at the resort?
 

Blue Streak

Life is hard. Skiing is easy!
Skier
Joined
Nov 12, 2015
Posts
2,579
Location
Golden
https://www.steamboatpilot.com/news/snow-hits-steamboat-ahead-of-new-gondola-debut/

The new Gondi officially rolls today with increased size and ease of entry/exit (@Blue Streak can explain) and is unexpectedly fast! The old Gondi used to take 12 minutes from the base to the Thunderhead lodge, the anticipated speed of the the Gondi was 10 minutes but the actual speed is just under 8 minutes! thats huge on a powder day.
No more “Doh!” every time I hit my head.
 

pchewn

Out on the slopes
Skier
Joined
Apr 24, 2017
Posts
994
Location
Beaverton OR USA
I'm surprised that the ski lift design wouldn't predetermine the speed of the lift more accurately than 20%. New lift designed for a 10 minute ride. Actual ride is 8 minutes.
Why? Is the lift 20% shorter? Is the rope speed 20% faster? Why wasn't the rope speed determined during design?

What if it was designed for 10 minutes and ended up at 12 minutes????
 

James

So much better than a pro
Instructor
Joined
Dec 2, 2015
Posts
10,872
Maybe they just lied about the time to exceed expectations. Or the time is quoted at 80% speed, which is prob what it runs at when not crowded. If you found out your car was 20% faster than quoted, you'd be happy. The reverse, not so.

Anyway, sounds good!

As for wifi, likely it's just to suck user data and maybe it's free because the company providing it keeps the data.
 
Thread Starter
TS
Ron

Ron

Seeking the next best ski
Pugski Ski Tester
Joined
Nov 8, 2015
Posts
6,888
Location
Steamboat Springs, Co
since im not an engineer and I didnt design the system nor work for Doppelmyr I cant say why its faster but there are a lot of factors that go into how fast something goes. from what I understand, it was supposed to take 10 minutes and in the testing it went 8. Maybe once they adjust the system it will slow down.
 

Beartown

Chasing the dragon
Skier
Joined
Apr 24, 2017
Posts
247
since im not an engineer and I didnt design the system nor work for Doppelmyr I cant say why its faster but there are a lot of factors that go into how fast something goes. from what I understand, it was supposed to take 10 minutes and in the testing it went 8. Maybe once they adjust the system it will slow down.
Maybe the reported duration of 10 minutes is an average between the actual traveling duration of 8 minutes and the zero mph when it's closed for maintenence.
 

pete

not peace but 2 Beers!
Skier
Joined
Nov 14, 2015
Posts
1,275
Location
Iowa
Maybe the reported duration of 10 minutes is an average between the actual traveling duration of 8 minutes and the zero mph when it's closed for maintenence.
it's a new toy ...


Doppelmyr should of nixed speed knob 11


Volume 11.jpg
 

raisingarizona

Out on the slopes
Skier
Joined
Sep 30, 2016
Posts
579
I'm surprised that the ski lift design wouldn't predetermine the speed of the lift more accurately than 20%. New lift designed for a 10 minute ride. Actual ride is 8 minutes.
Why? Is the lift 20% shorter? Is the rope speed 20% faster? Why wasn't the rope speed determined during design?

What if it was designed for 10 minutes and ended up at 12 minutes????
You must be an engineer. You guys are totally amazing with your calculations and such but rigid and struggle a bit when things aren’t so clear. 17 years ago I did an avie one course and we had an engineer in the group, he had a hard time with the uncertainty involved with snow science
 

pete

not peace but 2 Beers!
Skier
Joined
Nov 14, 2015
Posts
1,275
Location
Iowa
You must be an engineer. You guys are totally amazing with your calculations and such but rigid and struggle a bit when things aren’t so clear. 17 years ago I did an avie one course and we had an engineer in the group, he had a hard time with the uncertainty involved with snow science
A good engineer will simply view uncertainty as statistics and probabilities
 

teejaywhy

Getting off the lift
Skier
Joined
Feb 19, 2019
Posts
271
Location
AZ
I'm surprised that the ski lift design wouldn't predetermine the speed of the lift more accurately than 20%. New lift designed for a 10 minute ride. Actual ride is 8 minutes.
Why? Is the lift 20% shorter? Is the rope speed 20% faster? Why wasn't the rope speed determined during design?
We re-wired it. More Power! OoohRah!

source.gif
 

dbostedo

Asst. Gathermeister-- Aspen 2021
Moderator
Joined
Feb 9, 2016
Posts
6,476
Location
Northern Virginia, USA
Two possibilities to my engineering mind:

1) They always knew it could go faster per the design, but were waiting for empirical runs to confirm before claiming a higher speed
2) The spec for 10 minutes includes some leeway for weather or other conditions, and the 8 minutes is optimal in nice weather
 

mdf

entering the Big Couloir
Skier
Joined
Nov 12, 2015
Posts
4,172
Location
Boston Suburbs
Two possibilities to my engineering mind:

1) They always knew it could go faster per the design, but were waiting for empirical runs to confirm before claiming a higher speed
2) The spec for 10 minutes includes some leeway for weather or other conditions, and the 8 minutes is optimal in nice weather
Or 3), they are running it out of spec!
 

James

So much better than a pro
Instructor
Joined
Dec 2, 2015
Posts
10,872
Two possibilities to my engineering mind:

1) They always knew it could go faster per the design, but were waiting for empirical runs to confirm before claiming a higher speed
2) The spec for 10 minutes includes some leeway for weather or other conditions, and the 8 minutes is optimal in nice weather
3) the earth is obloid
4) they used the wrong factor converting to metric. Like Nasa. So it was shorter than they thought.
5) There's really nothing to this as the "ten minutes" was quoted from a guy who got it at the coffe shop over hearing some guy who heard it at the deli earlier. The deli source itself is questionable, but the sandwich was really good, enhancing the believability.

Going with 5)...
 
Top