As
@Muleski says above,
Ski Racing has been in a tailspin since digital media took off, and with the resultant drop in advertising revenue saw good writers find better paying gigs. Given the partial investment in their company by U.S. Ski and Snowboard for a number of years (a partnership which ended two years ago), you'd see a lot of verbatim press releases used as story copy - something
SR still suffers from to this day.
It is a shell of its former self. And that's a pity, because a lot of great sports media people cut their teeth at
Ski Racing over the years.
But as mentioned, they resisted the digital revolution. I remember only a few years ago when their subscription model was a pay-to-download PDF version of the print magazine, with a few articles being published online. That was a miserable failure back when Gary Black was still alive, and a sign that
Ski Racing Media had zero clue how to go about a digital model. Their current monthly payment model is better, but the content isn't that great if I'm to be honest. Their original writing from senior staff is still excellent and often insightful. The rest? Very hit-or-miss.
Whoever buys
Ski Racing needs to have a willingness to pursue the in-depth coverage, and a budget that allows seasoned reporters to follow the circuits and build rapport with the various governing bodies of the sport. They need to hire proper journalists with ski racing backgrounds, folks who have shown an acumen for writing
and researching their material. For their junior staff, they need a better mentoring system to pass along the craft (and it
is a craft to write effectively to deadlines). And they need editors to proof their spelling and grammar - I've spotted some real humdingers over the past few years.
They need to branch out from being so laser focused on covering only the U.S. skiers with any depth (this is the side-effect of being a clearing house for U.S. Ski and Snowboarding's PR wing). Back in the 1980s,
Ski Racing hit a great balance, covering junior racing and masters racing with depth and clarity, while also writing excellent pieces about international teams and star athletes. The typeface was small, but the amount of material was vast and informative. Sure, USST athletes got great coverage, but so did the Canadians, Europeans, South Americans, Asians, New Zealanders, and Australians. They covered the
world of ski competition, head to toe.
So that needs to be a focus for whoever ends up buying the company. They need to redouble any efforts to make the publication shine. They must make a compelling argument for the subscription fees. They need to offer something more than the same press release anybody can get on Google News or the AP app.
Ski Racing needs to be "must read" stuff for any fan or scholar of the sport.
If the buyers don't understand this, they're destined to the media scrap heap that's claimed so many victims over the past two decades.
Just my $0.02. I wish the Black family luck in finding a buyer who is willing to make the necessary investment and commitment.