Can a mod put this in the first post?
Amazingly no one was killed: https://www.panorama.am/en/news/2018/03/16/Ski/1920364
Amazingly no one was killed: https://www.panorama.am/en/news/2018/03/16/Ski/1920364
Funny thing is we rolled our truck and camper three weeks ago going skiing and it felt in slow motion. Then nothing till everything stopped moving. Don't know if you black out or cannot comprehend something happening that fast. Crashed on skis going fast as well and on sleds but that never happened. Luckily no real injurys. Totaled truck. All the first responders were great. Felt strange getting the help instead of giving it. The chairlift accident in Georgia reminds me of the video they use in training. You Tube video Eskimo chairlift.I have experienced the slow motion effect. It's real.
Hmm ... my thinking is the opposite. I'd rather have skis off so that I sink through the snow progressively, rather than have the skis provide a platform such that the snow arrests my impact instantly.
After a 12 foot cliff drop into double eject faceplant this weekend, I can attest the the facts that: 1) I suck, and 2) the skis and bindings provide enough give to help avoid injury. Even worse is that my wife has it on video.
Link to video please thank you.
Some fairly well-informed comments over on liftblog.com:
https://liftblog.com/2018/03/16/high-speed-rollback-in-georgia-injures-eight/
As far as straddling the bars, some areas have a bar at each seat. I think it was Alta or Snowbird at the gathering that had that. If you're 6 up on a six pack you have a bar between your legs.@Wilhelmson , I concur that skis might make the landing easier and safer. If you can bail before the cluster near the bottom that's good. If you have to bail right near the base of the lift, you want to be able to get out of the way of others.
@cantunamunch , good point about not trusting others to respond with readiness. The bar certainly is an issue and I may never straddle the down-post of another one again.
An emergency braking system that relies on power being available is bogus, just screams designer/engineer hired for reason other than competence.how often has the operator been trained to react on what to do? You cant just tell a worker one time what to do and then (after who knows how much time never having to do it) then react to do so.
But I don't get why this would even require an operator do to anything. The lift goes backwards and with todays tech that just shouldn't happen even without an operator imo. This is like saying an elevator needs an operator should a cable fail. I mean I don't know the mechanical workings of a chair lift but I do understand pulleys, gears, cables, motors, etc.... But other than the disaster of a cable breaking I find it hard to swallow that a roll back is even possible. Is not an automatic emergency roll back breaking system (and with back up too) something that is in place? I would even think by design (especially nowadays) that the lift is only capable of going in one direction and impossible to turn the other way unless you actually have to then disengage something purposely in order to go the other way intentionally. I just found it hard to believe it could even happen today and that it even needs an operator to do anything to stop it from happening.
It was an engineering flaw that allowed the human error to happen.
With all due respect to lift ops, they should not have the power to make a mistake like that.
Anyone know if that is the case here in North America? I'm hoping and guessing it's not. If it is, I'm a whole lot less comfortable getting on a lift with my kiddos tomorrow.
This video talks about this in detailIt was an engineering flaw that allowed the human error to happen.
With all due respect to lift ops, they should not have the power to make a mistake like that.
Anyone know if that is the case here in North America? I'm hoping and guessing it's not. If it is, I'm a whole lot less comfortable getting on a lift with my kiddos tomorrow.