Dumb question here: I thought the whole idea of the DPS treatment was to eliminate waxing going forward? If so, why are folks still waxing their treated skis? (Full disclosure, I did not completely read all 32 pages).
As described to me by the shop Mgr at The Mud Room in Jackson Hole which I also covered further up in the thread:
- There are two ski-to-snow kinds of friction to be overcome. I forget the exact terms he used, but the first was something like static friction, the friction to be overcome when you want the ski to get going from a dead stop. Wax excels in this situation. In fact, others have commented on noticing that the Phantomized skis seem to stick to the snow in lifelines.
-The other he called something like gliding friction, the ongoing tendency of the ski wanting to resist continued forward movement in the snow. Phantom excels at countering this kind of friction.
- Waxing the ski provides optimum glide in both situations.
- A Phantomized ski is better than a dry ski in all situations.
- A Phantomized ski will "look" dry, so wax covers that.
- On cold snow, under 20 degrees F, wax has better glide.
- On warm snow, like spring snow, Phantom has better glide. He said I'm really going to love the Phantomized skis on Mammoth's sticky spring snow. In fact, waxing the ski in that situation might be counterproductive.
- I have taken these points as license to stop taking along my wax iron. I've always found it very inconvenient to scrape wax in most of the hotel rooms or condos I stay in, so this has simplified packing for ski trips considerably. Now I carry a small liquid wax applicator for occasional use.