You still have those Nomads?
Yes. Good point. They may make good spring/rock skis.
You still have those Nomads?
If you do a fresh structure twice a year (spring skiing and winter skiing), how long before you use up the bases?
I freshen the structure a bit every tune or two with the Ski Visions tool. I have 166 days on one set of skis and 139 on the other. There's TONS of base left. But then I'm not running them through a machine every time.If you do a fresh structure twice a year (spring skiing and winter skiing), how long before you use up the bases?
Not long, but you don't need to do that. @Doug Briggs can do you a linear/light cross combo that works well both on gloppy runouts and at 5F with fresh snow off the T bar. Herself campaigned hers for about 40 days - east and west including California mank and Vermont arctic manmade sandpaper and Mid-Atlantic driving rain/monsoon.
Just aaFYI, DPS has been offering Phantom on their new skis since it came out. It cost about $50 and sometimes free. It is the buyers option
Oooooohhh.. I have always wanted DPS skis. I am waiting for their summer sale (if they do it again). It'd be cool get factory installed phantom on a set of DPS. I don't have a set of dedicated powder skis, I have a set of "east coast" rossignol's, funny enough, that ski is called "phantom 80" while my "every day" ski is a set of 2014 Volkl Mantra's.
No, but I skied the Rossi Phantom 80's at Aspen. I think it was the day Sully landed an airliner on the Hudson. Geez, couldn't get a more different ski than a Mantra.That name has bounced around a fair bit -anyone remember Phantom ski co? I've sort of been keeping an eye out for one of their Crystal Ships. ..
No, but I skied the Rossi Phantom 80's at Aspen. I think it was the day Sully landed an airliner on the Hudson. Geez, couldn't get a more different ski than a Mantra.
If by spring-like you mean wet and slushy, then that always sucks. Warm weather wax helps, but sticky snow (and feeling like you're getting thrown forward and your skis are being held back) are kind of the norm.
I just am annoyed every day I'm at Alta alone and I get on the lift with three random people and they all have DPS skis on, and start teasing me why I've got such loser skis, lol. (I don't think Mantra's are for losers, they just feel ill-equipped to some of the terrain at Alta when there is tons of snow).
It is not as well known as his other quotes about science and magic frex, but Arthur C. Clarke did once say that a sufficiently liquid cash flow is indistinguishable from expertise.Some skiers know how to turn and some have to buy their turns.
sufficiently liquid cash flow is indistinguishable from expertise.
It is not as well known as his other quotes about science and magic frex, but Arthur C. Clarke did once say that a sufficiently liquid cash flow is ALMOST indistinguishable from expertise.
I bet this is the going to be the trade off. I think wax will stick, but I doubt it will hold wax nearly as well as an untreated ski. I think that as soon as you design or treat a base to operate without wax, you compromise its ability to hold wax. This may be why ski manufacturers have not been leading the way on this. If they see that treated skis have market acceptance, we may see higher end wax free skis produced (I assume extruded bases fill the low end).TL/DR.. What happens if you got the DPS Phatrom treatment but also hot wax them? Does that harm the treatment underneath or does it prevent the wax from sticking at all.. Say really warm or really cold conditions warrant a more temp sensitive tune??
Me thinks: Must ... increase... cash flow....
If they see that treated skis have market acceptance, we may see higher end wax free skis produced (I assume extruded bases fill the low end).
Me thinks: Must ... increase... cash flow....