@vindibona1, I disagree with your suggestion to change edges before exchanging the weight. In my opinion, and in the coaching I've received from our trainers and demo team members here in Aspen, we want to, at a minimum, start the process of exchanging weight, and in performance turns actually complete the exchange of pressure, prior to changing edges. With modern ski design, we want that new outside ski edged high in the turn so that it can accept pressure high in the turn. That allows the ski to bend high in the turn and is more likely to result in higher ski performance,.Rather than elaborate on what I said, here's what you should think about. As I said, the movement sequence was the source of the problem, leading to the other issues. I'm going to try to make this as simple as possible. Try to engage the new corresponding edges in your turns BEFORE transferring pressure to the outside ski...
... That will require you to rethink a lot of things. Your body position, to release and re-engage will have to be much more downhill to unlock your feet. You will have to be in a lower position, with ankles and knees remaining bent to control edge angles. Then, as the new turn develops, you can extend INTO the hi-c of the turn (as LF's illustration called it). With the skis momentarily continuing in the direction of the old turn, you can then utilize momentum and centrifugal/centripetal forces to apply pressure to the already edged skis, as they begin to change directions, creating natural pressure where the momentum intersects with the direction change. It will also allow you to angulate in, because the momentum provides the lateral force and the edges hold the platform. Simultaneously you then SOFTEN THE INSIDE SKI TO ALLOW PRESSURE TO MAINLY GO TO THE OUTSIDE SKI AS YOU CONTINUE TO EXTEND THE OUTSIDE SKI. [If you extend too early, then you've prematurely used up your ability to fine-tune and adjust the pressure.] Then, as the turn progressed past the development stage of the turn, you will be begin flexing/compressing to allow the skis to continue to edge, but not be overpressured- as you transition into the subsequent turn, etc.
What you were doing was moving to the new outside ski too early, extending too early, failing to keep your mass moving aggressively downhill, interfering with the entire sequence of the turn. This gave up the dynamic shaping of the top of the turn, which leads to the dynamics of the rest of the turn. Now, when you "reseqence" your movement patterns you can still pressure the outside ski early (somewhat) if you want, but you will do that from a lower, flexed position and you'll be able to use the natural forces to control most of the aspects of the turns. Mostly the same mechanics, different order- with more control and dynamics. The only difference in the mechanics themselves that might need some enhancement is the concept of softening the inside to add more pressure to the outside. The proviso of that is that the natural forces have to be there first.
I hope this helps.
P.S.... I've already gone back and edited this four times to help with clarity... and I'm still not sure I got everything right the way I want to express it. As I said... I"m a terrible proof reader.
IMO, the issue with @karlo's turns is that he is moving away from the ski by dumping his body inside the turn rather than traveling with the new outside ski, tipping it to establish edge and a platform that can accept pressure, and bending it high in the turn.
Mike