ski otter 2

Out on the slopes
Skier
Joined
Nov 20, 2015
Posts
1,179
Location
Front Range, Colorado
This year demoing at SIA it was a real revelation to me how good and fun some - most - of the non-FIS spec GS-like skis were, 175 to 185, r 17 to r 23. Heads, Volkls, Blizzards, Atomics, Rossis, Stocklis, Dynastars, Fischers. I'll bet the Nordicas would have been great too if I'd had a chance at them.

@ScotsSkier , if you ever get the chance to pass on some of these, put me down as on your list, ready and willing!
 

oldschoolskier

Making fresh tracks
Skier
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Posts
2,474
Location
Ontario Canada
Bear in mind that there is often some misuse of the term cheater with GS skis. The “ cheater” GS is normally an 18-19 m radius and typically not the same quality/mix of construction as the real FIS GS ski. Recently however some people have also been using cheater to describe the ~25m masters, or “ tweener” GS skis ( for U16s) which have a much closer relationship to the real FIS ski (and are sometimes described as “FIS” skis). These are proper race skis, unlike the cheater 19m skis

While we are on this topic, watch this space for upcoming reports on some exciting new race skis......:popcorn: coming in......:rolleyes:
I think the Masters ski of today was referred to a cheater ski several years ago, and the cheater ski of today really is an ok advanced generic ski several years ago. I think of it as relabeling of terms.

As to what’s what I’ll go with your evaluations as the gospel any day.

May England live forever and Scotland a wee bit longer! ogwink:beercheer:
 

pile

At the base lodge
Skier
Joined
Sep 26, 2016
Posts
23
My wife is looking at some FIS slalom skis to freeski in the east (not running gates).

I see that the Head iSL RD had both a 156 and 158 cm length (as do the current year Head E-SL RD).
Is there much difference between the 156 vs the 158?
 

James

Out There
Instructor
Joined
Dec 2, 2015
Posts
11,575
My wife is looking at some FIS slalom skis to freeski in the east (not running gates).

I see that the Head iSL RD had both a 156 and 158 cm length (as do the current year Head E-SL RD).
Is there much difference between the 156 vs the 158?
The “shorter” versions are for lighter juniors and the longer for women. So, depends on weight and aggressiveness. Plenty of men skiing the longer versions. They’re probably the same length, never checked. Depending on brand they’re- 155/57, 156/58
 

Dakine

Out on the slopes
Skier
Joined
Dec 21, 2015
Posts
715
Location
Tip of the Mitt
I demoed some FIS slaloms but ended up on the RC4 SCs as a fun ski for crowded days or skiing with my spouse.
The FIS versions, as advertised, take too much concentration to ski for a full day.
They give up a bit in an icy slalom course but not much.
Left out of this review is the effect of tune on these skis.
A 0/4 tune is a whole lot different in feel than a 1/3 and SL skis really bring that out.
0.5/3 works for me since I don't much care for real ice due to the vibration on my old body.
 

pile

At the base lodge
Skier
Joined
Sep 26, 2016
Posts
23
The “shorter” versions are for lighter juniors and the longer for women. So, depends on weight and aggressiveness. Plenty of men skiing the longer versions. They’re probably the same length, never checked. Depending on brand they’re- 155/57, 156/58
Thanks James. Makes sense, I had seen some good discounts for the 156s but didn't realize they were a juniors ski (I thought the junior skis had "Team" in their name for Head). I assume the difference is primarily in the stiffness of the ski?

I demoed some FIS slaloms but ended up on the RC4 SCs as a fun ski for crowded days or skiing with my spouse.
The FIS versions, as advertised, take too much concentration to ski for a full day.
They give up a bit in an icy slalom course but not much.
Left out of this review is the effect of tune on these skis.
A 0/4 tune is a whole lot different in feel than a 1/3 and SL skis really bring that out.
0.5/3 works for me since I don't much care for real ice due to the vibration on my old body.
Totally agree about the tune playing a role, we both have ~80mm skis for most days (tuned at 1/3). I got a pair of 165 FIS SL (0.5/3 or 0.75/3, I forget) last year and really enjoyed them on the firm days here despite the extra attention needed with them.
 
Last edited:

James

Out There
Instructor
Joined
Dec 2, 2015
Posts
11,575
but didn't realize they were a juniors ski (I thought the junior skis had "Team" in their name for Head).
Not sure I’d call them “junior”. I know I did, but they’re not the kids skis. I think they’re called “tweener”.
They’re generally for U16’s or heavy/agressive U14’s.
Junior labeled slaloms go from roughly 130cm to 150-152cm, “kids” skis. They’re often cap skis these days.

It appears a 155cm Stöckli Fis Sl is an adult ski, so it doesn’t follow that size trend.

Atomic 155cm “tweener”
————-
The 2021 Atomic Redster S9 FIS Tweener SL Race Ski is a new and highly anticipated offering from Atomic for next season. Featuring the same construction and race plate as the 157cm and 165cm Atomic slalom skis, this 155cm ski is designed specifically for developing racers who have outgrown the junior ski but are not yet ready for the full-blown FIS ski. This Tweener version is much softer in the tip, allowing for easier turn engagement. It is perfect for U14, U16 or high school racers, or that developing racer who is transitioning off a junior ski.
——————————
 
Last edited:

pile

At the base lodge
Skier
Joined
Sep 26, 2016
Posts
23
Thanks again James, very helpful. Some of the ski companies seem a little bit cryptic with their product descriptions.

Interestingly enough on the website that you linked, they have the Head "tweener" ski as well (https://www.peakskishop.com/Head-Worldcup-Rebels-e-SL-Tweener-SL-Race-Skis-2021_p_7051.html) , which is a 151 length. Meanwhile, the "Mens/Womens" ski (https://www.peakskishop.com/Head-Worldcup-Rebels-e-SL-FIS-Skis-2021-MensWomens-FIS_p_7049.html) has both the 156 and 158 (as well as the 165).
 

pause

Booting up
Skier
Joined
Aug 19, 2017
Posts
38
This is THE thread that first brought me to PugSki while looking for a technical ski to coach young Devos. Hard to find this kind of info other places. Great to see it bump up.
 

Swede

Out on the slopes
Skier
Joined
Jan 29, 2016
Posts
1,386
Location
Sweden
It is a bit confusing re lengths as only a couple of years ago, 155 was the womens FIS. Stöckli perhaps held onto that standard (not really familiar with their products).
Junior SL is not cap skis. They are race constructions with sandwich/sidewall and often metal layers, just like the big ones but naturally in shorter lengths (130-150ish cm) and with softer flex. They have more in common with the adult FIS skis construction-wise than the ”cheaters”. They are built to be raced in courses, which the ”cheaters” really are not. Be careful with that. They don’t hold up and it is easy to wreck your new ski. Enjoy them outside the course.
 
Last edited:
Thread Starter
TS
ScotsSkier

ScotsSkier

USSA Coach
Industry Insider
Pugski Ski Tester
Joined
Nov 12, 2015
Posts
2,359
Location
North Lake Tahoe, NV
To @pile. The 156 Head is NOT a junior ski. In fact it is only in the last couple of years that Head introduced the 158. And in fact unless it has just changed, Blizzard do not ecen list a 158, just the 156 and 165. And I know several strong masters skiing the 156 Blizzard and also some who were skiing the 156 Head. You don’t tell us your wife’s height/ weight but unless she is 150+ plus and has thighs like a female WC racer, the 156 FIS Head will be plenty ski
 

Dakine

Out on the slopes
Skier
Joined
Dec 21, 2015
Posts
715
Location
Tip of the Mitt
What most folks don't understand is just how different professional athletes are from regular folks.
I don't know any WC level skiers but I do know some pro windsurfers like Matt Pritchard and one pro football player.
They operate at a level of fitness, focus and ability that you have to see in person to believe.
 

pile

At the base lodge
Skier
Joined
Sep 26, 2016
Posts
23
Thanks everyone for the helpful replies!

To @pile. The 156 Head is NOT a junior ski. In fact it is only in the last couple of years that Head introduced the 158. And in fact unless it has just changed, Blizzard do not ecen list a 158, just the 156 and 165. And I know several strong masters skiing the 156 Blizzard and also some who were skiing the 156 Head. You don’t tell us your wife’s height/ weight but unless she is 150+ plus and has thighs like a female WC racer, the 156 FIS Head will be plenty ski
I did leave the height/weight out before, but I understand the importance. She is a strong and aggressive skier but obviously there is a big gap to WC racers. Sounds like the 156 FIS are a good fit. Thanks again!
 

Sponsor

Staff online

Top