I know a Boulder local from another forum, and prior Eldora management had an extremely negative local reputation. So as much as I've ragged on Powdr over the years for Bachelor and Killington, they could easily represent an improvement at Eldora.
Pretty much all of the small Colorado ski areas were severely stressed in the 1980s and early 1990's and of surviving ski areas, Eldora probably came the closest to going under. While they expanded into Corona in the 1970's, they were operating so far into the red throughout the 1980's that they only operated the front face- Corona did not reopen until 1989. Amid ownership woes, the resort didn't operate in 1986-1987.
Things have been smoother sailing, but Eldora has never had a great relationship with the local government/forest service over expansions, road maintenance, etc. Most recently this was seen in the FS scrubbing most of the (pretty modest IMO) expansions in their MDP.
I am sure the shitshow that occurs whenever an upslope storm hangs in the forecast (where Eldora may get 3 feet while Breck/Copper get 3", and thus the whole world descends on little Eldora) doesn't help things.
So yeah, there is probably room for improvements in how the resort operates.
But, is Powdr the company that can do that? Maybe I am wrong, but when I think of Powdr and their resort philosophy, I always think "Just like Intrawest, but without any money." Maybe the no money is temporarily changed with the influx of Park City mercy money for the infrastructure, but I haven't seen Powdr in a big hurry to spend any of that...