Joe, which is it? You can't have both. In ski racing, there is nothing "wrong" with a "need". Though you certainly make a lot of good points I agree with. I agree with you about the "seamlessness" of a good racing transition and your photo above is a great depiction of one.
I love discussing the transition and have a few of my own ideas about it. The reason that the transition in the above photo is so short and quick is due to the skier demonstrating a “constant” rate (speed) of tipping through transition which leads directly to a constant state of turning the ski which then leads to a constant state of flow. If the skis do not have flow, it doesn't matter how flowing the body may seem. As a matter of fact, I believe flow for the entire package comes from the ski and not the other way around as some experts will contest by the way they ski. Because the tipping or, the “rolling over” of the ski, is not slowed or delayed during transition, the tracks go directly from one set of edges directly to the next. Those tracks leave a space between edge sets shorter than the length of the ski itself. What this means is that the turn has much more carving forces at hand within the same amount of distance/turn length. This is exactly how these crazy WC GS racers are moving so fast while facilitating such a high degree of turn at the same time - more edge engagement. But … this is also exactly how an aging skier can maintain dynamic athletic expert skiing due to the higher level of efficiency that this technique offers. It gives the skier more power to distribute throughout more of the turn. It’s what aging experts need as much as world cup racers, if not more.
To me, the above described transition is a key “racing fundamental” that can and should be directly transferred into anyone’s technical freeskiing regimen. Out of the race course, it will look different as it will not need to occur along with volatile undulations, erratic disengagements, numerous ski deflections and the forced pivots that a race course demands. Often, one turn in a GS course can be comprised of up to 3 or 4 highly bent tight radius bent ski deflections that along with unbent periods between, cumulatively add up to one big radius for the entire turn. It might be the equivalent of doing 200 lb. squats in the back of a pickup truck moving 40 mph while weaving in 20 meter radius turns over a road bouncing up and down from an earthquake. But “we” only need to squat about 75 lbs. in the back of a pickup traveling at only 25 mph and without the earthquake (thank you very much). Also, in a race course, the inside ski is light and prone to frequently bouncing off the snow much more than the more heavily weighted/pressured outside ski which, in turn, means that the outside has all the absorption ability and focus. It seems that there are many observers out there that think the inside foot is coming off the ground with some kind of technical intent or purpose. I can assure that this is not the case as it was in 1982. When we transfer “modern” racing fundamentals to free skiing on the open slopes, this type of transition works much better and really shines without the turbulent chaos associated with the forced ratio of speed and radius required of racing. Ski racing not only requires brute force, it also requires “brute” technique which favors the core fundamentals such as outside ski pressure, shovel pressure at initiation, clean alignment, etc. than it does the more sophisticated complexities that we are much more free to use and take advantage of outside of the course. Also, while racers use much less vertical motion than they used to, they still need to keep some in reserve to be able to drop on the ski when they need more powerful engagement on an immediate basis. When we free ski using race technique, we no longer have the need to reserve and replenish almost any vertical motion at all. We are able to do “more” of what a racer would love to be able to facilitate in a race course. Not less.
Three subset fundamentals of the racing transition that is actually “enhanced” on the free slope: #1. Always keeping “both” skis down on the snow and engaged (bent) as much as possible (from 50/50 at transition to 90/10 in turn completion), including weighted transitions, and sucking terrain like a vacuum cleaner with flexion and retraction for constant absorption so that the edges are always able to be constantly engaged, changing the direction of our momentum and either immediately ready to take over at any time throughout the turn. #2. A progressive transfer of weight/ for left/right pressure distribution, is much better than being on only one foot at a time (100/0 - 0/100) which actually lengthens and slows the transition as well as relinquishes the aspect of constant control of momentum, a smooth transition of power from ski to ski and the equivalent of taking one or both hands off the steering wheel of a race car in the middle of a turn. … and, #3. As mentioned above, the constant rate of tipping through transition. Ideally we are adjusting the rate during the high tipping and shaping phases of the turn (2.5 through 3). Tipping should only slow to a stop when it must start tipping in the other direction (phase 3) which is conveniently also where turn shaping “finalizes” our direction of mass out of the turn. Formulate these three transition skills into a single package and we are really cooking the good sh*t.
Ah yes, it's all in the transition....and that there are many inputs and variables, equipment, snow conditions, physical fitness.....
I'm agreement that the movements "come from" the skis, in the past 20 -25 years we've seen big changes, the old style top - down approach is largely gone in top recreational skiers, and all successful racers. However as much of what the skis can do is highly reliant on the upper body positioning and movements (or lack of) we still need to maintain focus.
I focus on racing as the technique is the most efficient - the pure carved turn is the Holy Grail of the successful racer. Plus, we have lots of video to look at....
My comment "Hirscher (and Kristofferson, Shiffrin, and the other modern top skiers) don't need to maintain any weight on their "inside" ski, many SL
Phase I's start with, as we see in the videos, inside edge engagement." relates to this move:
A good example of prioritizing inside ski tipping over rotary and edging. Hirscher has many, many moves in his quiver! During the same race at Kitz in 2016, archrival Hendrick won the day, with this recovery:
In both examples, their inside edges engage first from a no weight transition, and the transfer to the outside ski is so smooth it requires super slow mo to appreciate.
One of the biggest challenges for developing racers is developing high edge angles in both skis. Often, transitions are truncated with early edge sets, rotational movements, and lack of upper body separation (aka counterbalance). Building skills and confidence that allows the skier to comfortably roll both skis over should be a high priority.
Free skiing on groomed snow is a great place to practice and perfect these movements. Tops on the list, I think, is a relaxed transition (I prefer not to use "retraction" as that describes a more active movement).
I sometimes describe it as a a feeling akin to the moment when you relax to sit down on a comfy sofa or chair. It's very helpful to, as you describe, keep things close to the snow - "sucking terrain like a vacuum cleaner." A great training drill is to use a spine or wave track, or any handy rise or roller. I'll purposely time my turn so the transition is at the highest point of the rise, and practice minimizing pressure through relaxation as passing over the rise. It's a great drill and a lot of fun as well.