Have read many great responses to my question on Height vs Weight factors in ski selection. A recent response has led me to pose this new question. Someone thoughtfully stated that (paraphrased) tall, short, fat or thin, go with the ski that works
I now respectfully ask:
For a skier of a given competency level who is comparing multiple skis against the same future usage, what is the relative weighing of length/width/radius/stiffness?
Intentionally avoided boxing in the question
with a East, West, Ice, Powder, etc scenario. In usage, say comparing All-Mountain skis, what are the general merits and or repercussions of greater or lesser length, width, radius, stiffness?
I now respectfully ask:
For a skier of a given competency level who is comparing multiple skis against the same future usage, what is the relative weighing of length/width/radius/stiffness?
Intentionally avoided boxing in the question
with a East, West, Ice, Powder, etc scenario. In usage, say comparing All-Mountain skis, what are the general merits and or repercussions of greater or lesser length, width, radius, stiffness?