I would think an omniscient "other" narrator would not be breaking the fourth wall. But a character in the movie narrating would be - just like if they turned to the camera and spoke.
Now a character in the movie narrating from a different point in time, as though they are reminiscing, might not be breaking it. I guess that's actually the conceit in A Christmas Story. Hmm...
Right. That is the conundrum - this one is a grey area onstage even.
Nope - it's just bad directing. This is a soliloquy and is written to be a thinking aloud - the character is thinking to himself. Having the actor look into the camera was just bad a bad directorial decision as it changes the entire feeling of the soliloquy. It's like when children's theater does "hippy Shakespeare" or some other such blasphemy.35 posts and no Richard III?
ETA: I reskimmed the play Richard III and @cantunamunch is correct. The use of the pronoun "our" is clearly including the audience in the thought process along with the character. When I'm wrong, I admit it! I knew other characters broke the fourth wall, but I hadn't really looked closely at this soliloquy before. His soliloquies later in the play are more conventional "thinking aloud" type of moments. But it is still bad directing!
Last edited: