Exactly! Necessity is the mother of invention. If all ski brands were privately owned today, we'd have a much more healthy industry operating based on what's best for the sport, not wallstreet.
It's impossible for any brand to maintain it's position / stay true to it's strengths because that requires saying "no" more than yes which once publicly owned is impossible. The only conversation at public owned board room meetings and I sat through too many is how do we cut costs, and build more different products to sell to more different people for less than our competition. You eventually stand for nothing trying to sell everything to everyone. As far as why so much product in the market which definitely destroys the market, it's because some factories in europe have labor laws where companies can not reduce employees due to smaller business so instead they over build and dump it on the market. It's also because when public ski companies set budgets and goals and factory orders, it's over a year in advance of delivery, and 6 months prior to getting actual orders from shops. If shops don't order as much as they hoped, too late... they're stuck with it. It's also public companies pushing the brands to push their sales goals/budget which obviously requires building product. LIke Muleski said, if the people working at these companies actually owned them and had skin on the line, they'd make really great decisions that would long term benefit their brand's and ultimately the health of the industry.
And when you try to please everyone, you will please no one. What is thriving..err surviving in the industry now? Privately owned manufacture that actually have a focused direction and not a shotgun homoginized approach to building prodcut.