- Joined
- Nov 12, 2015
- Posts
- 6,329
I think there is also a touch of "my instructor/guru/friend who is a very good skier said this" and struggling to reconcile that with what some faceless person is now saying on tinterweb. This doesn't take account of the fact that their previous advice may have been tailored specifically to an issue they were having and not be a universal truth or of course vice versa.
I think there is definitely a problem with some pros assuming that people who get confused between the words inclination and angulation or don't really understand what counter means aren't good skiers. That isn't necessarily the case you don't need any of those words to be a good skier just like I don't need the word cadence to ride a bike.
To be a bit self confessional , and I'm not a geometric doofus even if I dropped the theoretical physics after 1 year at University, I find it really hard to follow discussions about inside and outside ski, because they change during a turn. What is wrong with left and right as these are constants for a skier and define the turn you are discussing as a left or right turn?
Edit: This thread was brought from the Trainwreck thread to create a new thread.
I think there is definitely a problem with some pros assuming that people who get confused between the words inclination and angulation or don't really understand what counter means aren't good skiers. That isn't necessarily the case you don't need any of those words to be a good skier just like I don't need the word cadence to ride a bike.
To be a bit self confessional , and I'm not a geometric doofus even if I dropped the theoretical physics after 1 year at University, I find it really hard to follow discussions about inside and outside ski, because they change during a turn. What is wrong with left and right as these are constants for a skier and define the turn you are discussing as a left or right turn?
Edit: This thread was brought from the Trainwreck thread to create a new thread.
Last edited by a moderator: