Corn is a way overused term. In the perfect state, It is smooth and the water content is obvious, and by the definition of how it forms, it can’t readily exist in skier traffic areas, i.e. resorts, because of the disruption of the grain to water structure required to create a corn cluster.
We’ve talked about the high altitudes of Colorado having too quick freeze-to-bake - certainly we don’t get anything like some of the maritime climates on or off resort.
I think the closest we get is on groomers. Zuma Bowl can have some really good corn-like conditions on the groomers.
And at times off-piste, but the base is often so cold it gets refrozen from underneath with even minor shifts in cloud cover or wind or temps or it bakes to sticky. This window literally lasted one run before refreezing.
We probably hate to admit that some of the best snow that we consider corn in a high altitude continental climate is GMO. As the early season man made base goes isothermal (temps consistent through the snowpack and where the snow in the snowpack is no longer frozen) then we get great granular slush skiing.
So while an isothermal snowpack promotes good corn development (not subject to refreeze from the snowpack itself), once the Colorado snowpack goes isothermal it is already in severe decline and can lose 4” a day in the high altitude sun, and the off piste is usually dirty and rotten by then.
That’s why our snowpack charts look like this and always go off a cliff in mid to late May:
We have some awesome spring skiing, but our window between a full snowpack and powder skiing and completely done is very short.