Phil, have you {or anybody else} skied the 83 enough to have a pretty good opinion of how it skis versus the 88? I'm 99% sure that I'm going to buy one of the two. I've skied the 88. Very impressed. Much preferred to my Brahma. Skied the Brahma is a 187cm. Brahma's a pretty versatile EC ski, does everything "pretty well". Don't need a jackknife. Monster is my kind of ski. Like everything about it….the profile, the flex, the dampness, the feedback, the "strength" is you will.
Fitting this in between an FIS SL, 180cm i.Speed {two pairs}, 177cm Titan, and then this years and two years prior 187cm Bonafides, Gen 1 and 2014-5 Bodacious, and Spurs. Head hard snow, Blizz the rest. Split ski days about 2/3's in New England, 1/3 in CO. This is my one ski that might fly with me, at least this winter.
I want to sneak something in there between the Titan and Bones. Probably will be my packed powder EC cruiser, with some more versatility than the current ones. Might be a slightly older snow ski in CO. Not going to be seeing much time in bumps, unless they are newly formed and soft, and I would say minimal time in trees…if any. Bones are my go to there. I'm not skiing there unless the snow is real soft.
My two local Head guys are not going to mount a 184cm 83 as a demo, and are "contemplating" mounting a 177cm 83. Hmmm. I know that I could buy the 88 and be real pleased, but I don't want that small devil skier on my shoulder saying "should have tried the 83" Ha!
So…what say you? Any thoughts? 5mm is a pretty tiny difference in width. I'm thinking there must be a bigger difference in the skis. hard to get intel. Lots out there on the 88, including my two days on it. Thanks