- correct not much, RS 96 Blk Ed 1550g @181cm vs 1610g @181cm for the standard RS 96, (even less of a difference between the two 106's), yet I'm finding good to very good reviews and recomendations on the Black Ed 96 and just mediocre WRT standard RS 96.
Good sign then that the construction of both skis are indeed similar except for the added carbon. Skis even between a left and right pair can vary 60grams.
Carbon can be used to save weight in skis like touring models by replacing heavier weight fiberglass sheets around the core for lighter weight fiberglass and end up with the same stiffness because of the added carbon fiber. The issue is that carbon fiber is not as good for vibration dampening as the heavier fiberglass so the lighter touring layup might be the same stiffness but not as damp.
Ski models using carbon stringers or fiberglass with carbon infused into the fiberglass weave with the same fiberglass weighs would add stiffness and rigidity, more energy and more days till the ski losses it’s pop.
Seems like what Elan is doing with these skis. Adding carbon without going to lighter fiberglass weights in response to the common complaint of the RipStick line which is that it’s a fun, playful ski but too soft and unstable at higher speeds especially for heavier skiers.
I’m sure it would would help for those on the fence for those that liked it but didn’t love it but it’s still a very light ski so it still won’t be a crud destroying, high speed charger. It should be an improvement of a light, fun ski that now should have a higher limit for speed and weight of the skiers that might like it.