I know I probably should stay out of this, but
@Philpug you do realize how your writing in protection of "Official Pugski Sponsor" adding "some of, if not the best skis that the ever" sounds? Exactly this is reason, why I don't give a shit about magazines, where articles are paid PR articles and not real stuff, and I was certainly hoping this won't turn into same thing. I admit I don't know any of you in person, or maybe I do, just that I have no idea you are under certain nickname on this forum, but I honestly doubt, regardless on "he would never sacrifice his name stating something not 110% true even if it's against company that sponsors you", once you get money or any other deal from company, that you are 100% objective. Well... I don't doubt, I'm sure about this. I'm not 3 years old kid, so I experienced enough in my life to be sure about certain things. So for me personally such things are actually taking away usability and especially objectivity of this forum, as it's turning into paid PR stunt without a single bit of relevance (exactly as those 2 PR postings above which are only that and nothing else, and most of claims are so ridiculous to anyone at least a bit into race business that it's useless to even respond to that), but it's not my choice. My choice is only if I want to participate in PR stunt like this or not. I know I already did when I decided to write this, but will stay out of it from now on.