SpauldingSmails

Uh oh, somebody's wrong on the internet again!
Skier
Joined
Jan 27, 2018
Posts
67
Location
Utah
Has anyone gotten a before and after assessment from an instructor while using Carv? Despite all the awesome technical criticism of the product do we know with any certainty that this will make one a better skier?

I'd love to try Carv. It looks to me like if I have an idea of what I am doing, get regular lessons, and apply what Carv tells me (meet the challenges), I'd likely become a better skier (to some limit of the product). But is that true?

Also, it would be cool as a diagnostic tool when I mess with my gear. For example, I could pick a specific challenge set and trail as a standard. Then if I add heel or tongue shims, buckle more or less tightly, change skis, change tune, change boots, et cetera I would know how it effects my skiing (i.e. how it effects the pressure on the bottom of the inside of the boot)...
 
Last edited:

strix

Terminal Intermediate
Skier
Joined
Dec 25, 2019
Posts
14
Location
Seattle
Been using the Carv for a week. It seems like a great prototype so far. Definitely worth the $200 whatever I spent on it.

It’s a weird mix of unbelievably good tools and, uh, tools with room for improvement. I’ll focus on the good since I think this thread has enough skepticism.

If you are already in pretty deep into carving, the killer feature seems like having it whisper in your ear per turn telling you how you are doing. After a few runs with the edge similarity metric, my turns felt noticeably cleaner. I could fix things from turn to turn. An instructor can’t get you this speed of feedback (let alone film lol). This feature alone more or less justified the cost for me. It also records all day and doesn’t sleep, unlike actual instructors.

Yes, someone could tell you “keep your lower legs more parallel through the turn”, but I’ve heard that advice before (and look, I’ve now told you too!) With the Dulcet Tones of “Samantha” things clicked. It tells you exactly which turns were good and exactly which ones were bad, just in time. In the end it was just repeating 95%+/-3 over and over on most moderate slopes.

There are a bunch of other metrics in the app that are similar that I haven’t played with much. I want to toy with the Yaw Similarity, but the yaw for one insert is straight up wrong (warranty is covering the replacement).

As a plus, the UX is pretty good. I have some quibbles, but mostly the app is just solid. It’s a pretty good ski tracks app for my purposes. A little crash-y, but definitely better than what I had been using.

If you are willing to fight with the installation/hardware and have a few hundred bucks to burn, try this thing out. It’s a bit of a gamble. You might love it, you might hate it. The upside can be pretty high, and the downside is the cost of a day of instruction at a mega-resort. I’m fairly certain it’s taught me more than a random instructor could in a day.

If you are cost conscious, wait for the hardware to stabilize, since they will be able to update the app/firmware, but not the hardware. Or just wait for someone on here to hate it, and just buy it used :P
 

UGASkiDawg

AKA David
Pugski Ski Tester
Joined
Nov 12, 2015
Posts
1,574
Location
CO
I've been skiing with one for about 3 weeks now. I had to sand my boot board to a bit and grind a channel for the cord but no big deal. I can't stand the audio coaching unless I'm using the training mode. When she says "let's go tiger you got this" I want to puke. The actual tips are mostly useful but not sure I know how to apply them to my style yet.

My highest skiIQ so far is 136 but is generally more in the high 1teens or low 120's.

Today I spent 2.5 hours doing nothing but the thousand steps training drill. 10 miles and ~7000 vertical feet of nothing but trying to complete 20 levels of thousand steps drills (made it through 16 levels with a few 3 star ratings ,mostly 1 star rating and some 2 stars scattered in). What I learned...I suck at that drill but got better and finding a place to do them on a Sunday during spring break is hard. I'm going to work through every drill over time.

It so far has let me know that my edge angles suck which I already knew but we'll see if I can improve that using training mode.

I like data and this tool provides it. Whether it improves my skiing remains to be seen.
 

Wannabeskibum

Getting on the lift
Skier
Joined
Nov 12, 2015
Posts
185
Location
Boston
I've been skiing with one for about 3 weeks now. I had to sand my boot board to a bit and grind a channel for the cord but no big deal. I can't stand the audio coaching unless I'm using the training mode. When she says "let's go tiger you got this" I want to puke. The actual tips are mostly useful but not sure I know how to apply them to my style yet.

My highest skiIQ so far is 136 but is generally more in the high 1teens or low 120's.

Today I spent 2.5 hours doing nothing but the thousand steps training drill. 10 miles and ~7000 vertical feet of nothing but trying to complete 20 levels of thousand steps drills (made it through 16 levels with a few 3 star ratings ,mostly 1 star rating and some 2 stars scattered in). What I learned...I suck at that drill but got better and finding a place to do them on a Sunday during spring break is hard. I'm going to work through every drill over time.

It so far has let me know that my edge angles suck which I already knew but we'll see if I can improve that using training mode.

I like data and this tool provides it. Whether it improves my skiing remains to be seen.
My scores are similar - mid 120’s and as high as 136, edge angles for me are higher on my Experience 88s than on my Enforcer 100s. Haven’t tried the coaching mode and just prefer to free ski and work on edge duration. Highest score that I have seen from anybody this year is 149. I think the top 20% of people are clustered in the mid 120s to mid 130s.
 

Mike King

AKA Habacomike
Instructor
Joined
Nov 13, 2015
Posts
2,196
Location
Louisville CO/Aspen Snowmass
I bought one to try out. I used it for 4 days with some problems -- it would score some runs, but not others despite having as much as 3600 feet of descent to score. When I returned from Hawaii, I loaded the beta software, which require setting up the sensors again. In two days since, the devices have not been correctly calibrated despite going through the motion setup both days. The first day, it showed 0 percent similarity in rotation, the second 0 for similarity in edging. I've got a support request into Carv, who earlier had noted that there might be some known hardware problems.

Mike
 

Tim Hodgson

PSIA Level II Alpine
Instructor
Joined
Aug 20, 2016
Posts
250
Location
Kirkwood, California
its a flawed premise that your in balance should be on the ball of your foot. So flawed that I think using this product and trying to keep it from beeping at you could potentially make someone a worse skier.
If have already discussed this in a thread, would you kindly provide the link? If not, would you kindly explain? In this or in a separate thread?
 

mikes781

Booting up
Skier
Joined
Mar 30, 2018
Posts
44
Location
NJ
I bought one to try out. I used it for 4 days with some problems -- it would score some runs, but not others despite having as much as 3600 feet of descent to score. When I returned from Hawaii, I loaded the beta software, which require setting up the sensors again. In two days since, the devices have not been correctly calibrated despite going through the motion setup both days. The first day, it showed 0 percent similarity in rotation, the second 0 for similarity in edging. I've got a support request into Carv, who earlier had noted that there might be some known hardware problems.

Mike
I’ve been using the iOS beta for a few weeks now and recently it’s been pretty stable. Saw that a firmware update got released today. Hopefully that straightens out the issues for you.
.
 
Top