• For more information on how to avoid pop-up ads and still support SkiTalk click HERE.

Blossom White Out for Sidecountry?

njdiver85

Booting up
Skier
Joined
Feb 10, 2016
Posts
22
Thinking of putting touring bindings on a pair of Blossom White Out's for sidecountry and some inbounds use. Has anybody done this and if so, were you still happy with how they skied?
 

jmeb

Enjoys skiing.
Skier
Joined
Nov 13, 2015
Posts
4,496
Location
Colorado
Personally a 77mm waisted ski without much rocker, titanal, and a tight turn radius isn't what I would want for backcountry skiing. Of course, depends on where you are and what you're looking to do. Those seem much better suited for ripping around inbounds.
 

Dakine

Far Out
Inactive
Joined
Dec 21, 2015
Posts
1,155
Location
Tip of the Mitt
I have a mixed opinion.
Mine (176) are mounted with a plate and race bindings.
They are total frontside carving machines on groomed man made or packed natural snow.
But the other day I skied them in 6" medium dense powder over groomed.
They worked great and that 132 mm tip has some real float to it.
If you want to ski more down in the fresh than right on top, I think they would work surprisingly well in sidecountry.
 

jmeb

Enjoys skiing.
Skier
Joined
Nov 13, 2015
Posts
4,496
Location
Colorado
But the other day I skied them in 6" medium dense powder over groomed.
They worked great and that 132 mm tip has some real float to it.
If you want to ski more down in the fresh than right on top, I think they would work surprisingly well in sidecountry.

YMMV of course, but in my experience, the snow conditions in the backcountry are a whole lot more mixed than you get inbounds. How a ski performs in powder over groomed is not indicative of how it is likely to ski in unconsolidated, highly-variable backcountry snow. Despite the media around backcountry skiing which is powder powder powder, the reality is typically a world of weird you never really see inbounds because it gets beaten down by skier traffic and machines.

Which is why when I look for backcountry skis I tend towards things with ample tip rocker, taper, and a longer sidecut than I do for inbounds skis. You're rarely going to tip a ski on edge to straight carve, the ability to pivot and not hook in weird snow is much more important.

One example of this is Down skis "Long Radius Concept": https://www.downskis.com/about/construction . After skiing a variety of skis in the backcountry, I have to say I am a believer in this. For someone who just wants to skin up their local hill and ski down a groomer, it wouldn't really apply though. And I think that for a ski you want to spend some times inbounds on, there is probably a happy medium between something as sharp as the White outs mid-teen radius, and the LRC 41m radius.
 
Last edited:

James

Out There
Instructor
Joined
Dec 2, 2015
Posts
24,967
YMMV of course, but in my experience, the snow conditions in the backcountry are a whole lot more mixed than you get inbounds. How a ski performs in powder over groomed is not indicative of how it is likely to ski in unconsolidated, highly-variable backcountry snow. Despite the media around backcountry skiing which is powder powder powder, the reality is typically a world of weird you never really see inbounds because it gets beaten down by skier traffic and machines.

Which is why when I look for backcountry skis I tend towards things with ample tip rocker, taper, and a longer sidecut than I do for inbounds skis. You're rarely going to tip a ski on edge to straight carve, the ability to pivot and not hook in weird snow is much more important.

One example of this is Down skis "Long Radius Concept": https://www.downskis.com/about/construction . After skiing a variety of skis in the backcountry, I have to say I am a believer in this. For someone who just wants to skin up their local hill and ski down a groomer, it wouldn't really apply though. And I think that for a ski you want to spend some times inbounds on, there is probably a happy medium between something as sharp as the White outs mid-teen radius, and the LRC 41m radius.
Interesting on the Down skis. Certainly makes sense. For one, just sidestepping in 3-d snow with a 15m 176would be annoying as the foot sinks.
Have you skied the Down? Never heard of them. Not that much rocker.
 

jmeb

Enjoys skiing.
Skier
Joined
Nov 13, 2015
Posts
4,496
Location
Colorado
ave you skied the Down? Never heard of them. Not that much rocker.

Haven't yet. But I should be skiing them come this weekend once I mount them up. The CD104Ls have plenty of tip rocker and just some mild tail rocker.

Full report to come.

IMG_4148.jpeg
 

Philpug

Notorious P.U.G.
Admin
SkiTalk Tester
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Posts
42,919
Location
Reno, eNVy
Talk about your missapplications.
 

Sponsor

Staff online

Top