Aspen update here. More later, but seems reasonable.
That does seem reasonable. The only question mark I have is the point of implementing a reservation system if needed. How quickly would they be able to implement it? Furthermore, if you get to the Christmas holiday period and then decide yup, we need to implement a reservation system, that has the makings of a bad situation. That first day they realize a reservation system needs to be implemented will be miserable for those on the mountain that day and potentially unsafe in the ensuing mayhem. Furthermore, even if they can immediately implement a reservation system the very next day, that has a high probability of creating chaos noting the number of visitors that traveled all the way there only to find out the rules have changed, a reservation is required and they might not get one.Aspen update here. More later, but seems reasonable.
That would be interesting if they weren't. Because they partly own Alterra.I would have liked to see some mention of Ikon... though I assume that means they're trying to keep it business as usual (as far as being able to use the pass).
Yeah... that does seem pretty exclusionary, rather than offering typical rates and a raffle/lottery type system. Especially given the unique circumstances of this upcoming season.I find the apparent motive of limiting capacity through high prices quite objectionable, and I imagine many others will also.
Yeah, and we are talking about Aspen at the end of the day. The town itself is noted for being where many of the uber wealthy like to congregate. So it shouldn't be a huge revelation to most that the skiing is on the upper end of the spectrum socio-economically.Yeah... that does seem pretty exclusionary, rather than offering typical rates and a raffle/lottery type system. Especially given the unique circumstances of this upcoming season.
BUT, in general, it's also the way a lot of things work, and business in general... limited supply and increased demand mean higher prices, or higher prices can caused less demand and naturally limit supply. Aspen isn't in business to make less money. So if they are trying to maximize revenue, given the restrictions they have in front of them, higher prices is the way to go.
I would have liked to see some mention of Ikon... though I assume that means they're trying to keep it business as usual (as far as being able to use the pass).
Well, a Sun Valley pass is no longer the most expensive in the country, although it still is for seniors since we don't have a senior rate.
I find the apparent motive of limiting capacity through high prices quite objectionable, and I imagine many others will also.
So, yeah, they raised prices on the non-local passes and lowered substantially the local pass price. I like it. Of course, I live in Pitkin County and am not a billionaire....
Only for the midweek pass though right? Looks like the Chamber pass (which lots of lots of people working in the valley get) went up 3-400$ this year if you need ability to ski weekends.
Welp, this addresses my concern about ultimately needing a reservation system at Aspen or other Alterra results.Question: I’m an Ikon/Mountain Collective Passholder, what does this mean for me?
Answer: We will institute a reservation system for Ikon Passholders accessed through ikonpass.com or the Ikon Pass app.
There are some smart cookies on Pugski. The ski industry ought to scour these threads for people to recruit@Wasatchman — I formerly did a bunch of IT procurement. And I work in analytics.