I may have the opportunity to get these skis, and wondering how anyone has liked them for big mountain skiing in the west. Thanks!
Paging @Lady_Salina to the lavender courtesy phone.
Yes. I really liked them in light deep snow. They don't have a ton of rocker so they may(emphasis on may) be a little more work in heavier powder, but they work amazingly well as a hard charging, crud busting or light powder ski.I may have the opportunity to get these skis, and wondering how anyone has liked them for big mountain skiing in the west. Thanks!
completely different feel.Haha...Ok, I'll do my best! Thanks everyone.
So, they might be less fun than, say, the Salomon QST 106? Or the Atomic Backland 109? Or the Atris Birdie? Due to lack of rocker? I haven't looked at their construction, just the comparison in width/length to these others...
The Rossi has improved over the past few years, so the tail comes through the finish of the turn better than it used to, making its hardback performance a little better, but I still think there are a few other skis out there that are a bit better.Thanks so much! I guess it comes down to my skiing them, now...
I hesitate to add this ski (another one I was offered for a great price, due to my Atomics not getting warrantied...):
Rossignol Soul 7 104 (2017). Never skied the Soul line, hear they're great in pow but meh on hardback (all-rocker, I think?).