So much is said about the use of angulation and counter. Recently, I am discovering that the muscles required for for-aft balance and for simple squat are different when angulated and countered than when standing upright. This could have a significant effect on someone's ability to angulate and to counter on steeper terrain.
About a year ago, I injured the muscles of my left pelvis. Gluts, piriformis, and, not knowing all the other muscles, certainly more. The skiing on less steep terrain is now fine, though when I angulate more, extend my outside leg more to the outside, the but muscles on the left get stretched, and at end of day, there is a burning or needle sensation. No big deal when I ski. However, recently, I was skiing steeper terrain, some with bumps and I found I could not hold my left-footed turns. The left leg would collapse, or not respond fast enough. A left footed encounter with a mogul would throw me back and I could not get back forward. Since then, the last couple weeks, I have been playing around on dry land. I find that, when countered and angulated, holding say the back of a chair for balance, I have far greater difficulty squatting and rising with my left side. If I shift myself fore and aft, I feel my left side muscles having far more difficulty, and I feel unstable. Not so if I am just upright.
So, the point I want to make is, an advanced intermediate skier, or even an advanced skier trying to develop more dynamic skiing with high edge angles may not face a skill-only issue. Someone weak in the necessary muscles may encounter a physical barrier to advancement, and, to overcome that barrier, dry land exercises and stretches may be needed. Had I not had this injury to one side, and its negative effect on symmetrical performance, left and right, I would not have noticed the difference. I would have simply thought that I was doing as much as I could and accept I could not do more.
Edit:
And, the issue I would like to discuss is, whether there a way to measure one’s physical capabilities, and limitations, ideally to benchmark against great skiers, so that one can purposefully work towards enhancing one’s capabilities?
About a year ago, I injured the muscles of my left pelvis. Gluts, piriformis, and, not knowing all the other muscles, certainly more. The skiing on less steep terrain is now fine, though when I angulate more, extend my outside leg more to the outside, the but muscles on the left get stretched, and at end of day, there is a burning or needle sensation. No big deal when I ski. However, recently, I was skiing steeper terrain, some with bumps and I found I could not hold my left-footed turns. The left leg would collapse, or not respond fast enough. A left footed encounter with a mogul would throw me back and I could not get back forward. Since then, the last couple weeks, I have been playing around on dry land. I find that, when countered and angulated, holding say the back of a chair for balance, I have far greater difficulty squatting and rising with my left side. If I shift myself fore and aft, I feel my left side muscles having far more difficulty, and I feel unstable. Not so if I am just upright.
So, the point I want to make is, an advanced intermediate skier, or even an advanced skier trying to develop more dynamic skiing with high edge angles may not face a skill-only issue. Someone weak in the necessary muscles may encounter a physical barrier to advancement, and, to overcome that barrier, dry land exercises and stretches may be needed. Had I not had this injury to one side, and its negative effect on symmetrical performance, left and right, I would not have noticed the difference. I would have simply thought that I was doing as much as I could and accept I could not do more.
Edit:
And, the issue I would like to discuss is, whether there a way to measure one’s physical capabilities, and limitations, ideally to benchmark against great skiers, so that one can purposefully work towards enhancing one’s capabilities?
Last edited by a moderator: