They tout it as their "Women's BMP: Forward binding mounting point to make turning easier for energy-saving skiing." Reminds me of the sales guy who was shocked my friend was shopping for the Backland 102s because "women don't usually like skis that wide. Anything over 95 or 100, their thighs just get too tired."
This is their visual for the women's line - god I hope it's not to scale. I kind of face palmed when they reached out this winter like "Is it the colors? Is it the Ranger name? Why don't women like our skis?"
View attachment 72614
Dredging up an old thread but I just read this and felt compelled to comment - I demoed a different 2020 Fischer womens ski, the My Pro Mt 80, and had a pretty weird time on it. I felt oddly off-balance in the fore-aft plane and although I could get some ok performance out of the ski and I could kind of see it had potential - my balance was just constantly being thrown and I was totally done after only a single run. My legs and knees were hurting and I just couldn't face another run on those skis. I had no issues with the other brands I demoed both before and after that ski (on the same day) and I don't think the Fischer ski was any more demanding than the other skis i was on (largely a selection of Augment skis) so it was a bit of a mystery to me, but seeing this comment, I wonder if Fischer just did a poor job on the mount point for a lot of their womens skis? Now I wonder what the My Pro Mt 80 would be like with the mount point shifted back a bit!