Does this change anybody's plans for the Ikon outside of the PNW to travel there?
Yes.
Does this change anybody's plans for the Ikon outside of the PNW to travel there?
While this is probably true, Crystal makes a great destination when it has snow in a year where other destinations are in a drought. With the Ikon pass it makes this more likely.
I'd agree this makes it much more likely, but still probably not a lot of people if I had to guess. It all depends on what people are looking for in their ski trips... I don't think you can argue that the experience staying at Crystal isn't quite the same as the rest of the major resorts on the Ikon pass (of which there are many to pick from).
. I’m mostly thinking of the luncatic fringe who bother to participate in ski forums, right?
the luncatic fringe
So...tell us about early season patterns at Crystal, up to NYE, in weak El Nino years?
Hey, I resemble that statement.
Actually El Niño years don’t have much consistent correlation with snowfall around here. .
Steven's Pass is also part of the Powder Alliance, where you get 3 days at 19 resorts as part of a home season pass. My home ski pass (FUSION PASS for Timberline and Mt Hood Skibowl) is also part of the Powder Alliance. I'm guessing with the buy-out that this is the last year Steven's will be on the Powder Alliance, so I'm planning on getting there.
In fact, I'm formulating a plan to do a NW road-trip of the Powder Alliance areas: Timberline, Mt Hood Skibowl, Steven's Pass, Bridger Bowl, Bogus Basin, Schweitzer, Silver Star, Whitewater.
So I may be visiting with @New2PDX and @David Chaus ....
I'm with you that the Cascadia pass will shortly be history.I'll go way out on a limb and predict this is the last year for the Cascadia pass. Good news for Seattle. Maybe bad news for the Idaho ski areas that thrive on road-trippers from Seattle?
IMHO, this will be good. Stevens desperately needed an influx of capital for lift replacement. Crystal has excellent lift infrastructure and grooming machinery (drivers, meh,... somedays good, somedays not so good), but there's no 'there' there. There's been plans for years for new lodging at the base area. Once that happens, Crystal will be well worth a M-F midweek ski week trip... think Taos north. The area already gets a good influx of powder chasers when the rest of the country isn't popping. All in all, it makes a ton of sense and seemed to be a 'when' rather than 'if'. I think the owner did quite well in the sale, so there you go. Yes, I'm guessing we'll lose the 10 and under ski free deal which is a bummer.... don't know if that'll happen this year or not, but it sure makes it more likely that I'll go back to teach there.
I was thinking Tamarack, Brundage, Schweitzer, and Sun Valley all might suffer if folks from Seattle start heading to Epic/Ikon areas instead.
As geographically isolated as the Seattle area ski bubble is nationally, the inland northwest is even more so. Sun Valley is interesting.. Most of the Seattle skiers I know who frequent there are property owners there and don't really travel anywhere else all too much, and if they did, picking up a couple of ikon or epic passes for themselves and the grandkids isn't a big deal. That said, I doubt that's a sustainable economic model given human life spans and all, sooooo.... The hill that seems germane to the ownership shake up might be Whitefish as well.
Agree with this in full. Schweitzer has its own local market, but that market probably isn't large enough to be compelling either IKON or Vail. I could see SV join IKON as a week in an attempt to pull Crystal/Snoqualmie skiers in that direction instead of other choices. The Sun Valley trip was a bigger deal when I was a kid. Today, SV has its diehards and fans, but I see way less of the folks I ski with planning trips to SV (unless they have a place, a tradition, etc. . ). Whistler took that spot in the ski consciousness of Seattle people over the last two decades.